Schumacher: “I thought it was a ridiculous decision at the time”

Thursday, 11 April 2024, 9:32
7
1 min read

Steven Schumacher wants his side to keep their heads up with relegation fears remaining very real for them after they lost 3-0 at the Swansea.com Stadium yesterday evening.

But the Stoke boss also reflected back on two key refereeing decisions – one to disallow a goal from Niall Ennis after the ball came loose from Carl Rushworth with the second being the award of a penalty to the Swans for what he believes was a foul outside of the box.

Neither were decisions that Schumacher could line up behind as he looked back on the game as he told the Stoke official websiteย โ€œI thought it was a ridiculous decision at the time,โ€ Schumacher said of Cityโ€™s disallowed goal.

Embed from Getty Images

โ€œI had a good view of it and it looked to me like the goalkeeper tried to take a quick throw-in, he has collided with Niall, who isnโ€™t aware he is even there, and has then tapped the loose ball in.

โ€œI felt it was a poor decision at the time and when our analyst has shown me the replay, I can see itโ€™s definitely not a foul.

โ€œIt is disappointing, we didnโ€™t play great in the first half, but it should have been 1-1.

โ€œThe decision for the penalty for the second goal also looks like the challenge is outside of the box so that is two big calls, in a game that wasnโ€™t going the way we wanted it to, we needed to go for us and they didnโ€™t.”

Stoke now face a massive match against relegation rivals Sheffield Wednesday on Saturday and he was clear as to what he expected from his teamย ย โ€œSheffield Wednesday will be a physical game, they are going to put balls into our box, they are going to have a lot of set-pieces – that is how they got their goals last night – so we will have to defend those situations better than how we did tonight.

โ€œThe message is no sulking, get our heads up and go again because it is another huge game at the weekend.โ€

Embed from Getty Images
Do you want the latest news from JackArmy.net direct to your phone? Then subscribe to our Telegram channel here
Images courtesy of Getty Images, Athena Picture Agency and Swansea City Football Club.

Loading new replies...

Avatar of Smurph
Smurph

Alan Curtis

3,765 messages 1,979 likes

On closer inspection it looks like we got away one last night, maybe two if you include the penalty.

Makes a change though, we're normally on the receiving end of these types of decisions.

Reply Like

Avatar of Gors Buster
Gors Buster

First Team Player

406 messages 172 likes

With the game he was having, Iโ€™m surprised Stroud never sent the Stoke lad off for it.

Reply 1 Like

Avatar of K23
K23

Ivor Allchurch

4,276 messages 292 likes

Definition of 'possession' by a goalkeeper

"Once the goalkeeper has gained possession (also known as โ€œcontrolโ€) of the ball, an opponent may not interfere with or block the goalkeeperโ€™s distribution of the ball. For example, players have a right to maintain a position achieved during the normal course of play, but they may not try to block the goalkeeperโ€™s movement while he or she is holding the ball and trying to distribute it. Nor may opposing players do anything to hinder, interfere with, or block a goalkeeper who is throwing or punting the ball back into play. The goalkeeper has already gained possession and is granted up to six seconds to release the ball back into play by other players. A goalkeeper in the act of distributing the ball may not be challenged under these circumstances. (This includes trying to head a ball out of the goalkeeperโ€™s open hand or playing a ball being bounced or tossed into the air by the goalkeeper.) An opponent does not violate the Law, however, if that player takes advantage of a ball clearly released by the goalkeeper directly to him or her, in his or her direction, or deflecting off him or her nonviolentlyโ€

In yesterday's case, Rushworth definitely had 'possession' and 'control' of the ball with both hands but it was dislodged from his 'possession' by Ennis's head as he stood up. Yes, it was clearly unintentional but that doesn't matter, any infringement is still an infringement whether intentional or unintentional. In fact, free-kicks are probably awarded more often for unintentional fouls or handballs than for clearly intentional ones with the latter more likely to result in a yellow card. Maybe it was borderline at worst but reading that, I think the ref just about got it right.

Reply 1 Like

click to expand...
Avatar of Pegojack
Pegojack

Ivor Allchurch

4,018 messages 428 likes

Thank you. I said exactly that in the match thread, but there are still many posters on here saying we 'got away with one'.

Reply 2 Likes

m
magicdaps10

Mel Nurse

2,182 messages 389 likes

It was the correct call in regards the Rushworth incident.

If the goalkeeper is in control be it with 2 or even 1 hand then it can't intentionally or unintentionally be taken from him.
Rushworth had control and was in the process of giving a quick throw out when Ennis popped his head up and knocked it out of his hand/s.........to give a quick throw out then he clearly has control on the ball because he intentionally trying to create a play by throwing the ball out.

Wether the ref knew 100% or not the rulr.......he got the call spot on.

Reply Like

C
CurtessECarr

Tommy Hutchison

1,259 messages 48 likes

At the time. I certainly thought we got away with it. I was like all of us relieved when he disallowed it.

Reply Like

B
Baron Goblet

Alan Waddle

798 messages 7 likes

This was an unintentional foul.

The penalty was also a good call.

Good refereeing.

Reply 1 Like

Phil Sumbler

Been watching the Swans since the very late 1970s and running the Planet Swans website (in all its current and previous guises since the summer of 2001 As it stood JackArmy.net was right at the forefront of some of the activity against Tony Petty back in 2001, breaking many of the stories of the day as fans stood against the actions where the local media failed. Was involved with the Swans Supporters Trust from 2005, for the large part as Chairman before standing down in the summer of 2020.

League Table

Next Up

Forum Latest

Threads: 21,148

Messages: 289,296

Members: 4,729

Latest member: SY-

Next Up

League Table

Last 6 Results

Latest from Blog

Swansea City: Incompetence reigns through yet another window

Yesterday morning we opened the day by sharing a few articles form previous years the day after the closure of the January window.ย  They were from 2022, 23 and 24 where the reports (linked at the end of this report) talked about the nature of the window just passed and…

Swans TV: Croeso Lewis O’Brien | Lewis O’Brien signs for the Swans

. . . Watch Lewis Oโ€™Brienโ€™s first interview as a Swansea City player on Swans TV after the midfielder completed a loan move from Nottingham Forest. For more information, as well as all the latest Swansea City AFC news, log onto the club's official website at http://www.swanseacity.com Subscribe on YouTube:…

Swansea City: Andy Coleman has much to answer for right now

Swansea City Chairman Andy Coleman has often asked us to judge him by his actions and all too often when we sit back and do judge him on those actions we realise just how out of his depth he is as Chairman of a professional football club. Many people will…

Don't Miss

Swansea City: Incompetence reigns through yet another window

Yesterday morning we opened the day by sharing a few

Swans TV: Croeso Lewis O’Brien | Lewis O’Brien signs for the Swans

. . . Watch Lewis Oโ€™Brienโ€™s first interview as a