Ten games in. Three wins. Three defeats. Four draws. A goal difference of zero. It’s a record that doesn’t scream crisis, but it certainly doesn’t whisper progress either. And when you zoom in on the details, the picture gets even murkier. The three victories? All against sides currently marooned in the relegation zone. That’s not a foundation. That’s a warning.

This was supposed to be different. The summer window was, by almost universal consensus, the best we’ve had in years. Smart acquisitions, depth in key areas, and a sense that the club was finally building something with intent. There was buzz. There was belief. But ten games later, the table tells a story of stasis. Mid table. No momentum. No spark.

It’s not just the results. It’s the tone of the performances. A side that looks cautious when it should be confident. Passive when it should be proactive. There’s a flatness to the football that feels at odds with the ambition that defined the off-season. And while it’s true that the Championship is a brutal, unpredictable league, it’s also true that clubs with serious aspirations don’t settle for beating only the bottom three.

Supporters aren’t asking for miracles. They’re asking for signs. Signs that this team is capable of more than just surviving. Signs that the manager has a plan that goes beyond containment and damage limitation. Right now, those signs are hard to find.

The mood is shifting. Quietly, but unmistakably. What started as cautious optimism is curdling into concern. Not panic. Not fury. Just that creeping sense that something isn’t quite right. That the pieces are there, but the picture isn’t forming. And at the centre of it all is Alan Sheehan — a manager who was handed the keys after a promising interim spell, but who now finds himself under the microscope.

This isn’t a crisis. But it’s not far off becoming one. And if the next few weeks don’t bring clarity, conviction, and points, then the questions will only get louder. Starting with the most uncomfortable one of all: is this really working?

💼 Not What the Owners Ordered

This summer wasn’t just about squad building. It was about brand building. The owners didn’t invest in players to finish 13th after ten games. They didn’t bring Luka Modric to the training ground, or invite Snoop Dogg and Martha Stewart into the fold, to watch the team drift through the early part of the season. These were calculated moves designed to elevate the club’s visibility and position it as something more than just another Championship outfit. The message was clear. This was supposed to be different.

But different is not what we’ve seen. The team has beaten only the bottom three. The football has been flat. The goal difference is neutral. And the mood, both in the stands and behind the scenes, is starting to shift. The owners didn’t greenlight a strong transfer window to watch the club tread water. They didn’t appoint Alan Sheehan on a permanent basis to see the same patterns repeat.

Right now, Sheehan looks like a continuation of the last three managers. Cautious. Reactive. Uninspired. The football lacks identity. The performances lack conviction. And the ambition, at least on the pitch, feels muted. There’s a growing sense that Sheehan fits the mould too well. That he’s another safe pair of hands who won’t rock the boat but also won’t steer it anywhere new.

That might have been acceptable in years gone by. It’s not acceptable now. Not with the investment. Not with the exposure. Not with the expectations. This isn’t about demanding promotion in October. It’s about demanding progress. Demanding identity. Demanding performances that reflect the ambition shown off the pitch.

Because right now, there’s a disconnect. The club is talking like a top-six contender but playing like a mid-table placeholder. And that’s not what the owners ordered. If the football doesn’t start matching the ambition, the manager might find himself the next thing they decide to change.

📆 A Huge Week for Sheehan

Seven games to define a future. That was the line yesterday. But after Saturday’s draw, the focus narrows. Two home games in seven days. Norwich and QPR. Both winnable. Both vital. And suddenly, it feels like the next chapter in Alan Sheehan’s story might be written before the month is out.

This isn’t just about climbing the table. It’s about survival, not in the league, but in the job. Because with just one win in the last five league games, the pressure is mounting. Slowly, steadily, and now visibly. The owners may have circled seven fixtures, but if the next two go badly, they may not wait for the other five.

Norwich are struggling. QPR are inconsistent. These are not fixtures to fear. They are fixtures to target. Fixtures that should yield points. And yet, based on recent form, there’s no guarantee of a return. The team looks tentative. The football lacks conviction. The manager, once hailed for his clarity and calm, now looks caught in the fog.

Four points from these two games might buy Sheehan time. Anything less could trigger conversations behind closed doors. The club didn’t hand him the reins to settle for mediocrity. They saw something in his interim spell — a spark, a connection, a sense of direction. But that version of Sheehan feels distant now. Replaced by a manager who seems more concerned with containment than ambition.

The timing matters too. Two home games. Two chances to show the fans something. To show the owners something. To show himself something. If the team fails to deliver, the questions won’t just be about tactics. They’ll be about suitability. About whether Sheehan is the right man for this moment, this squad, this project.

It’s not yet a crisis. But it’s close. And in football, proximity is often enough. The next seven days could shape the season. They could also end a tenure. In a league where momentum is everything, standing still is the fastest way to fall behind.

Sheehan needs results. He needs performances. He needs belief. And he needs them now.

❓ Is He the Right Man for the Job?

The Alan Sheehan who earned the permanent job isn’t the Alan Sheehan we’re watching now. Last season’s interim spell had clarity. It had energy. It had a sense of purpose. This season’s version feels muted. The football is cautious. The intent is unclear. The identity, if there is one, seems rooted in risk avoidance.

It’s a familiar pattern. Russell Martin. Luke Williams. Now Sheehan. Three managers, three iterations of the same problem. Possession without penetration. Structure without spark. A tactical approach that prioritises control but forgets ambition. While Sheehan was supposed to be different, he’s starting to look like a continuation.

The squad isn’t built for containment. It’s built for expression. There are players who can hurt teams, who can dictate tempo, who can take games away from opponents. But they’re not being used that way. The system feels rigid. The substitutions feel reactive. The overall tone is one of caution, not conviction.

The away draw at Southampton was a perfect example. A point on paper, but a performance that felt like surrender. This wasn’t Anfield. It wasn’t the Etihad. It was a mid-table Championship side with vulnerabilities. Yet we sat back. We played for the point. We looked content to avoid defeat rather than chase victory.

That’s not what this squad was built for. It’s not what Sheehan was hired to deliver. If he wants to keep his job, he needs to change. Not just the results, but the style. The intent. The way this team approaches games. Right now, it’s hard to shake the feeling that the manager is holding the players back. And the players know it.

🧮 A Short Stay of Execution?

There’s no fury in the stands. No banners. No chants. Just a quiet, growing sense that this isn’t going anywhere fast. The promise of the summer is being squandered. The manager, for all his early promise, might not be the right fit after all.

Even if Sheehan picks up results this week, it may only delay the inevitable. The issues run deeper than points. They are about style, identity, and belief. Right now, the team looks like it’s playing with the handbrake on. That’s not sustainable. Not in this league. Not with this squad. Not under this ownership.

There is still time to turn it around, but it is running out. The next two games could be a lifeline or they could be the final straw. When ambition meets inertia, something has to give.

Unless Sheehan finds a way to change the narrative quickly, decisively, and convincingly, even a win or two might just be a short stay of execution.

Loading new replies...

3
3swan

Mel Nurse

2,329 messages 426 likes

He deserved the chance.
The summer did look as if we had identified problem areas but we were bringing in players with potential.
For whatever reasons the jigsaw isn't taking shape.
Now is it tactics or players not capable?
At the moment I think a combination of both.
Something has to change, and that normally lies at the door of the coach.
Performances have to show signs of improvement of there can only be one other outcome.

Reply 5 Likes

c
cmajack

Lee Trundle

1,752 messages 571 likes

Great article, couldn't have summed it up better myself, but apparently I'm anti Sheehan because I've said most of that in my posts.

Reply 3 Likes

F
Frenchjack

Reserve Team Player

64 messages 29 likes

Superbly written article which basically puts into words what most swans fans are thinking 👍

Reply 1 Like

m
magicdaps10

Ivor Allchurch

4,030 messages 1,276 likes

He needs to revert back to what we witnessed last season, it seems he has gone more conservative and pragmatic.

Let the handbrake off Alan FFS or get a time machine and bring back Ayew in his prime.
It's a blinkered view at present and it needs changing.

I would rather draw or lose games with us having the intent from the start to win it ourselves.....more so than going out with a mindset of getting the point and coming out of it with the battling point or a loss.

Reply 1 Like

B
Blackpooljack

Tommy Hutchison

1,355 messages 211 likes

I couldn't agree more in fact I'd add that it's probably the most insightful piece I've ever read on here and would agree with it 1000%, if the owners haven't had AS in for a meeting I'd be very suprised.

Reply Like

Avatar of Dr. Winston
Dr. Winston

Michu

2,616 messages 1,372 likes

The key paragraph for me.

Some people have pointed the finger at the change in assistant coaches, and there might be some merit in that, but ultimately it's down to Sheehan. Whilst he wasn't my first choice for the job initially, performances as the season went on certainly earned him the role. He needs to find that spark again. To be braver in his team selections, less predictable in his substitutions, more flexible in his approach.

I've gone on and one about his preferred midfield being all too similar. All good players, all hard working, all capable, but none of them are creators. We need that bit more in there. Be it Widell finally getting a decent chance or Eom moving infield into a role I think would suit him better.

We need to move the ball with more pace. We're not as consistently sideways and backwards as we have been at times in the past, but we do take too long to bring the ball forward. And we absolutely have to stop trying to sit deeper as halves and games go on. I loathed that when Russy did it and I like it no more now.

Reply 2 Likes

click to expand...
3
3swan

Mel Nurse

2,329 messages 426 likes

“We need to move the ball with more pace”

100%

I wouldn’t like to have counted the times I shouted pass (at the TV) on Saturday.
Not sure what my blood pressure got to but ended the game with a bloodshot eye.

Hope to be fit for Wednesday 😏👍

Reply 3 Likes

Avatar of Swans Jack
Swans Jack

Lee Trundle

1,899 messages 1,022 likes

Perfectly said.

'' This isn’t a crisis. But it’s not far off becoming one. And if the next few weeks don’t bring clarity, conviction, and points, then the questions will only get louder. Starting with the most uncomfortable one of all: is this really working?''

'' There’s a growing sense that Sheehan fits the mould too well. That he’s another safe pair of hands who won’t rock the boat but also won’t steer it anywhere new.''

'' That might have been acceptable in years gone by. It’s not acceptable now. Not with the investment. Not with the exposure. Not with the expectations. This isn’t about demanding promotion in October. It’s about demanding progress. Demanding identity. Demanding performances that reflect the ambition shown off the pitch.''

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of Swans Jack
Swans Jack

Lee Trundle

1,899 messages 1,022 likes

Not sure if it's him trying to protect his job or its something else. When he was Interim he had nothing to lose and everything to gain. It's nagging at me why the players are not going for the kill, something doesn't seem right. Is Sheehan telling them to play cautious? He has to get this right, I'm not calling for his head but in many ways I would of rather us of gone at Southampton and lost than perform the way we did it's a valuable point but it comes with its consequences? I think next 2 home matches we will see more attacking mind set. But he has to stop with playing with caution and fear when we go up against certain teams

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of JackSomething
JackSomething

Ivor Allchurch

4,752 messages 1,356 likes

Could be something to do with the article being written 10 games into the league season while you've been criticising him since the preseason friendlies?

Reply 1 Like

s
sit_down_jack

First Team Player

298 messages 262 likes

Seems like we’re trying to play how we played last year, with ball winners and high intensity, but none of the new midfielders are suited to it. Not their fault of course, we should be trying to play in a way that suits the squad's strengths. Yalcouye, Stamenic and Galbraith are not O’Brien. I think a double pivot of Stamenic and Galbraith would work well, the 10 isn’t as obvious but Cullen, Yalcouye and Widell can be tried. Feels like we need a change in approach.

Reply 2 Likes