There’s no point dressing it up: this season has not gone the way the Swansea City ownership would have imagined when they laid out their plans in the summer. The club has spent far too much time glancing nervously over its shoulder at the bottom three. A managerial change before winter, a raft of new signings struggling to make the impact expected of them, and a general sense of drift on and off the pitch were never part of the blueprint. The owners spoke openly about accelerating progress, pushing the club forward at pace, and building something that could grow quickly. Instead, the first half of the campaign has exposed cracks that can’t be ignored.

And when a season unfolds like this, it forces a moment of reflection. It has to. The owners will have looked at the structure of the club and realised that something fundamental isn’t right. The departure of Richard Montague shortly after the summer window closed left a gaping hole in the recruitment department, a hole that has never truly been filled. Whatever the reasons behind his exit, the impact was immediate and obvious. Recruitment is now being led, from a distance, by Adam Worth, an analyst with no background in heading up football operations. That’s not a criticism of Worth as a professional; it’s simply a reality of expertise. Swansea City have been operating without a proper football leader in one of the most important areas of the club.

And that absence has already cost us. The pursuit of Kim Hellberg was the clearest example. Hellberg was, without question, the club’s first choice when Alan Sheehan departed in November. Swansea identified him early, moved quickly, and believed he was the right fit. But in the end, they couldn’t get it over the line. Whether that was down to structure, persuasion, or simply the lack of football authority at the table, it was a blow. Vítor Matos has done an excellent job since arriving, nobody can deny that, but the episode highlighted the same underlying issue: Swansea City are trying to run a modern football operation without enough football people in the building.

Which brings us to Tom Gorringe. Whatever his strengths, and he clearly has some, he is now overseeing a multi‑million‑pound football club while seemingly trying to shoulder far too much of the operational burden himself. Fans are right to question whether he has the experience and credentials to lead both the business and football sides of the club. His recent attempts to engage supporters, including turning up in pubs before matches, will win him some goodwill. But goodwill isn’t what gets transfers right. Goodwill doesn’t build a coherent football identity. Goodwill doesn’t fix structural weaknesses. Fans want decisions made by people who know the game, who understand recruitment cycles, who can spot a player, who can build a squad, who can challenge a head coach constructively. Right now, with Gorringe and Worth effectively running operations on and off the pitch, it doesn’t feel like Swansea are in that place.

That’s why Gorringe’s confirmation at last week’s fans’ forum, that the club is progressing with the appointment of a Director of Football, is not just encouraging. It’s vital. It is the clearest sign yet that the owners recognise the need for expertise, leadership, and football intelligence at the heart of the club’s decision‑making. But the caveat is obvious: it has to be the right person. Not someone cheap. Not someone inexperienced. Not someone who sees Swansea as a stepping stone or a favour. This club is crying out for a figure with real football authority, someone who can build a recruitment department, set a long‑term strategy, and stop the cycle of repeated mistakes that have plagued recent windows.

The only frustration, and it’s a fair one, is that this appointment is coming late. January is already upon us. Plans for the window will have been drawn up weeks ago, and those plans have been shaped by an inexperienced CEO and a data analyst. That’s not ideal. It’s not even close to ideal. The hope now is that the incoming Director of Football has already been consulted informally, or that they will have enough influence, quickly enough, to shape the final decisions. Because Swansea cannot afford another window where the squad is patched together, where short‑term fixes outweigh long‑term planning, or where the club’s identity is left to drift.

But despite the timing, despite the frustrations, despite the questions that still hang over the structure of the club, this move is unquestionably the right one. Swansea City cannot progress at the pace the owners keep talking about without proper football leadership. They cannot build a squad capable of climbing the Championship without someone who understands the market, understands the game, and understands how to build a club from the inside out. They cannot keep repeating the same mistakes and expect different outcomes.

So yes, welcome this. Embrace it. Demand that it’s done properly. Because if Swansea City get this appointment right, it could be the moment the club finally stops firefighting and starts building again. And after the chaos, uncertainty, and missteps of the past few months, that would be a step in exactly the right direction.

This article first appeared on JACKARMY.net.

Loading new replies...

m
magicdaps10

Ivor Allchurch

4,466 messages 1,597 likes

👌👏👏👏

I feel incredibly strong with most things wrote in this article, it's clear that we need these things to progress and eradicate any possible scenarios that can come back to bite us....things we have already seen and experienced.
I think after so many years of stale approach from the previous owners that some sections of fans are getting excited and possibly carried away with the proactive approach with the new owners. The approach is great but they have very little experience and knowledge of how to run a football club and we have seen issues arise already so lessons need to be learned to grow and move forward.

Let's have some positivity but let's not also be dull enough not to want to build and improve, ask questions and speak up when we have opportunities to push on.

Reply 3 Likes

click to expand...
Avatar of LeonWasTheDogs
LeonWasTheDogs

Tommy Hutchison

1,017 messages 595 likes

Great post. The summer transfer window proves your point perfectly; a lot of people getting really excited just because we actually spent some serious money on a few players for once ( ~£7m), Inoussa (c. £5m) and Widell (c. £4m in the Jan before). All could be very good for us eventually, but it takes time for the youngsters especially to get used to this league. People thinking we were suddenly going to start challenging for promotion was getting a bit daft.

It’s great that we’re looking to improve on and off the pitch. We do need to professionalise the club after the mess under Kaplan and Levien. A DOF is vital*, and an experienced and proven one too ideally given the inexperience of the owners.

*or at least getting the right leadership team is vital, covering all the bases. Football ops, chairman, recruitment lead, the manager, etc. We’ve got a good case for needing a DOF given the lack of any serious experience amongst the others.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of FearOfAJackPlanet
FearOfAJackPlanet

Lee Trundle

1,769 messages 1,348 likes

The impression I got on this topic was that Montague was let go, not because he wasn’t considered any good, but because Gorringe, in a state of hubris and deep within the cost-cutting drive he was so happy to pat himself on the back over during that interview he gave to those YouTube business bros, thought they could do away with the expense of a DOF. The recruitment team will identify the players, and he’ll do the negotiations and get the deal over the line and handle football operations.

I think that idea became another casualty of the stark reality that’s smacked the club in the face as the hazy days of summer turned into Championship campaign reality. Whether the owners stepped in or Gorringe realized the expense of a DOF is necessary after all, I don’t know, or care. I just hope they find someone with some fresh ideas and relevant experience.

Reply 1 Like

click to expand...
Avatar of Ronald Parp
Ronald Parp

Roger Freestone

5,059 messages 597 likes

We’ve had a shill on here for the last couple of years telling us how great it was going to be when Cravatt and Co took over, people bought in to it, the campaign worked. If it had been made clear that a football club was going to be run by a tipster working from home it might not have sounded quite so exciting.

Reply Like

Avatar of Neath_Jack
Neath_Jack

Roger Freestone

6,194 messages 1,898 likes

Just let people be excited, let them fall in love with the new manager, let them believe that this is the turning point in our recent fortunes. It’s tough times out there for many people and football has always been the escape. Let people be happy without being a fun sponge for them. This site and its negativity saps you on times with the constant drudgery, thankfully where I sit in the stadium it’s full of eager anticipation of what may be on the horizon.

Reply 3 Likes

Avatar of Smurph
Smurph

Roger Freestone

7,665 messages 5,220 likes

These owners are far worse than Kaplan and Levien, aren't they.

Reply Like

Avatar of Swanjaxs
Swanjaxs

Roger Freestone

18,520 messages 4,726 likes

Brilliant post, up there with one of your very best 🫶

Reply 1 Like

Avatar of Smurph
Smurph

Roger Freestone

7,665 messages 5,220 likes

Excellent post 👏🏼

The last line is the most valid part. Most of the negativity on this forum which I whole heartedly agree with when you say saps your energy, comes from those who very rarely set foot inside the stadium.

Reply 1 Like

Avatar of Ronald Parp
Ronald Parp

Roger Freestone

5,059 messages 597 likes

That might be your opinion, I don’t necessarily agree, but all opinions are welcome. 👍

Personally I feel they have the potential to be better because their intentions appear to be more aligned with the football side of the club as well as the business side. It’s early days and there’s been a few mis-steps, which they seem to have tried to address, but my outlook is more cautious optimism than hyperbole.

Reply Like

Avatar of Smurph
Smurph

Roger Freestone

7,665 messages 5,220 likes

So you think they're worse than our previous owners?

Reply Like

Avatar of Ronald Parp
Ronald Parp

Roger Freestone

5,059 messages 597 likes

No I don’t but it’s early days. You said they were worse didn’t you?

Reply 1 Like