Things are progressing well at Swansea City at the moment.  New owners, some seemingly good appointments off the pitch and some potentially excellent transfers on it.  It’s a world apart from the dreadful decisions of the not too distant past under the now departed Chairman Andy Coleman (and, in fairness, some of the people that went before him)

Although this is very much a time to look forward, we always feel it’s relevant to look backwards so we asked Jackbot to take a look back at the reign of Andy Coleman – one to be forgotten but certainly one from which we can take many lessons.

Jackbot writes

Andy Coleman’s two-year tenure as Chairman of Swansea City, from May 2023 to May 2025, was a period marked by grand ambitions, significant investment, but ultimately, a profound and damaging disconnect with the very fanbase he sought to embrace. Arriving as a significant shareholder with a self-proclaimed “all-in” commitment, even relocating his family to Swansea, Coleman initially fostered cautious optimism among the Jack Army. He spoke of a “fresh start,” a return to “football people making football decisions,” and a promise of enhanced transparency and engagement. Yet, these aspirations quickly unravelled amidst a series of questionable decisions, perceived tactical misalignments, and a growing chasm in communication that left supporters feeling unheard, undervalued, and increasingly frustrated.

The Dawn of a New Era: High Hopes and Early Promises

Coleman’s appointment in May 2023 was heralded as a potential turning point for a club that had experienced a gradual decline since its Premier League relegation in 2018. His initial statements were precisely what the weary fanbase yearned to hear. “I’m putting my whole life into this club and this community,” he declared, pledging to “work tirelessly to represent the club in a manner that supporters can take pride in.” This wasn’t merely corporate jargon; it was accompanied by the tangible commitment of moving his family to Swansea, a gesture that resonated deeply with a community fiercely proud of its club and often suspicious of absentee ownership.

He emphasized the need for a football-centric approach, promising that “football people making football decisions” would be the guiding principle. This was a crucial point, given past frustrations with what was seen as an overreliance on analytics or detached decision-making from overseas. Coleman also vowed to increase transparency and engage directly with supporters, even introducing “Audience with the Jack Army” sessions, offering one-on-one meetings, a novel concept aimed at building bridges. The message was clear: Swansea City would be run with integrity, ambition, and a renewed connection to its roots.

Embed from Getty Images

Early Missteps: Managerial Merry-Go-Round and Sporting Director Shortcomings

However, the honeymoon period was remarkably brief. Coleman’s early decisions, particularly regarding key footballing appointments, swiftly undermined his stated intentions and laid the groundwork for future discontent. The simultaneous appointments of Paul Watson as Sporting Director and Michael Duff as first-team manager proved to be critical missteps, both of which would end in disappointment and further erode trust.

Paul Watson, brought in from Luton Town, arrived with a mandate to revamp the club’s recruitment and footballing infrastructure. While initially praised by Coleman as “an incredibly talented individual with tremendous football knowledge,” Watson’s tenure was heavily criticized for its perceived failures in the transfer market. The summer window under his guidance failed to adequately strengthen the squad, particularly in key positions, leaving the team looking vulnerable. Allegations soon surfaced that recruitment was overly reliant on data-driven processes without sufficient on-the-ground scouting or a deep understanding of the Championship’s unique demands. These concerns would persist even after his departure in October 2023, less than six months into his role, highlighting the initial flaws in Coleman’s recruitment strategy for the footballing hierarchy.

The appointment of Michael Duff as head coach was arguably an even more significant error. Duff, known for a more direct, pragmatic style of play, was a radical departure from the possession-based, ‘Swansea Way’ philosophy that had defined the club’s identity for over a decade. While some argued for a more robust, results-oriented approach, a significant portion of the fanbase felt that Duff’s style was fundamentally incompatible with Swansea’s DNA. The football was often uninspiring, and results failed to materialize consistently. Duff was sacked in December 2023, after just six wins in 21 games, a tenure of less than six months. This rapid turnover in both Sporting Director and Head Coach within Coleman’s first half-year as Chairman spoke volumes about a lack of clear strategic direction and flawed decision-making at the top. The promise of “football people making football decisions” seemed hollow when those very people were either quickly deemed unsuitable or, as some argued, not given the resources or autonomy to succeed within a coherent vision.

Embed from Getty Images

The Transfer Market: A Recurring Nightmare

If initial appointments caused unease, the club’s dealings in the transfer market under Coleman’s chairmanship became a consistent and major source of fan anger. The January 2024 transfer window, occurring shortly after a significant ownership change in November 2023 (where Steve Kaplan and Jason Levien sold their controlling stake to a group including Brett Cravatt, Nigel Morris, and Jason Cohen, with Coleman continuing as Chairman and injecting further funds), was widely described as “disastrous.”

Despite the new ownership group injecting over £20 million into the club, fans saw little tangible investment on the pitch. Crucial areas of the squad were left unaddressed, and the team’s depth and quality appeared to diminish rather than improve. The sale of key players, often without adequate replacements, further fueled the narrative that the club’s financial stability was prioritized over on-field ambition. Luke Williams, who would later be appointed manager, even hinted at issues with the transfer structure, stating that “the structure was not right and some people didn’t have a lot of experience in signing players and getting deals done.” This suggested a disorganised and inefficient approach, a stark contrast to Coleman’s initial promises of a “high-performing organisation.”

The perception of a “sell to buy” model, a consistent source of fan frustration in previous years, continued to plague Coleman’s tenure. While financial prudence is necessary, the lack of visible reinvestment of player sales proceeds into squad strengthening left supporters feeling that the club was treading water, or even regressing, rather than pushing for a return to the Premier League. The January 2025 window similarly failed to inspire confidence, reinforcing the belief that the club’s recruitment remained fundamentally flawed under Coleman’s oversight.

The Eroding Relationship with the Fanbase: Communication Breakdown

Perhaps the most damaging aspect of Andy Coleman’s chairmanship was the severe deterioration of his relationship with the Swansea City fanbase. What began with pledges of open communication and reconnection rapidly devolved into a chasm of mistrust and perceived silence.

While Coleman did implement “Audience with the Jack Army” sessions, intended to foster one-on-one engagement, many fans felt these were insufficient and lacked genuine transparency. Critically, during periods of significant on-field struggle or off-field uncertainty, Coleman was often perceived as being invisible. The absence of direct communication from the Chairman, particularly when the club was enduring poor runs of form or when major decisions were being deliberated (such as the protracted process surrounding Luke Williams’ future), left a void that was quickly filled by speculation and resentment.

Fans expressed frustration at the postponement of promised fan forums, even when demand was high for direct answers. When forums did occur, some felt they were “tick box scenarios,” offering little genuine opportunity for challenging questions or meaningful dialogue. Accusations of being “invisible” during crises, and a perceived lack of empathy for the supporters’ frustrations, became prevalent. One fan pundit even claimed Coleman’s promised communication had become “deafening silence” during a “dreadful January,” especially concerning the Luke Williams saga. This contrasted sharply with his initial commitment to being a chairman “on the ground with the authority to run the club.”

Furthermore, incidents such as a reported celebratory outburst in the boardroom during a game against Cardiff City, perceived as taunting visiting directors, added to the impression that Coleman, despite his personal investment, lacked a nuanced understanding of the deeply ingrained customs and rivalries within British football culture. Such actions, even if unintentional, were seen as unprofessional and further alienated segments of the fanbase.

The Luke Williams Saga and the Final Straw

Embed from Getty Images

The appointment of Luke Williams as Head Coach in January 2024, following Michael Duff’s departure, brought a brief resurgence of the “Swansea Way” and initially offered a glimmer of hope. Williams, with his background at Notts County and previous connections to the Russell Martin era at Swansea, was seen as a return to the club’s preferred style. However, the initial optimism was short-lived.

A poor run of results in early 2025, culminating in just one win from ten games, saw the club plummet towards the relegation zone. The handling of Williams’s future became another major point of contention for Coleman’s leadership. Fans observed a slow, indecisive process regarding the manager’s position, with many feeling the decision to dismiss him came far too late, leaving the club dangerously close to a League One battle. This indecision further highlighted the perceived “knowledge gap in how football operates in the UK” within the board, as noted by some commentators. Williams was eventually sacked in February 2025, becoming the third manager to depart under Coleman’s direct influence.

By this point, the relationship between Coleman and the supporters was irrevocably damaged. The initial promises of ambition, stability, and connection had evaporated, replaced by a sense of drift, poor decision-making, and a leadership that seemed unable or unwilling to genuinely engage with its core constituency.

The Departure: Personal Reasons Amidst Public Discontent

In March 2025, Andy Coleman announced his decision to step down as Chairman at the end of the season, citing personal reasons and a desire to return to the United States with his family. While the Swansea City Supporters’ Trust acknowledged his “financial and personal commitment,” and the club statement highlighted his efforts in areas like bringing the women’s team into the club and strengthening FAW ties, the overwhelming sentiment from the fanbase was one of relief, tinged with disappointment at what could have been.

Coleman’s personal sacrifice in moving his family to Swansea and his clear dedication to the club cannot be entirely dismissed. He genuinely appeared to want to succeed and to make a positive impact. However, the world of football chairmanship, particularly in the Championship, demands more than just personal commitment and business acumen. It requires a deep understanding of football’s unique culture, an ability to make shrewd and timely footballing decisions, and, crucially, a transparent and empathetic relationship with the supporters who are the lifeblood of any club.

Conclusion: Lessons from a Turbulent Tenure

Andy Coleman’s time as Chairman of Swansea City serves as a poignant case study in how good intentions can be undermined by poor execution and a failure to adapt to the specific demands of the football industry. His initial promises of a fresh start and renewed connection ultimately felt unfulfilled, contributing to a period of instability and frustration on and off the pitch.

The key failures can be distilled into several critical areas:

  • Flawed Footballing Appointments: The rapid turnover and perceived unsuitability of both the Sporting Director and initial Head Coach demonstrated a fundamental misjudgment in key footballing personnel, undermining the “football people making football decisions” mantra.
  • Ineffective Transfer Strategy: Consistently disappointing transfer windows, characterized by a lack of visible investment in crucial areas and allegations of over-reliance on data without practical scouting, severely hampered the team’s ability to compete and alienated supporters.
  • Communication Breakdown: Despite initial promises, Coleman’s perceived silence during crises and a lack of consistent, transparent engagement fostered a deep sense of mistrust and disconnect with the fanbase.
  • Cultural Misalignment: While personally committed, a perceived lack of understanding of British football’s unique culture and fan expectations contributed to a growing alienation.

Ultimately, Andy Coleman’s reign was a period where a chairman with significant personal investment and a desire to succeed found himself at odds with the complex and emotionally charged world of football, failing to translate his business principles into sustainable on-field progress and a harmonious relationship with the loyal Jack Army. The lessons learned from this turbulent chapter will undoubtedly shape the expectations and demands placed upon future leadership at Swansea City, reinforcing the enduring truth that a football club’s success is not solely measured in financial balance sheets, but in the pride and connection felt by its supporters.

By JackBot

Loading new replies...

Avatar of Dr. Winston
Dr. Winston

Mel Nurse

2,408 messages 1,069 likes

Duff was the wrong fix for a problem correctly identified. We badly needed to move away from the "Swansea Way" approach as utilised by Russell Martin. Coleman's biggest mistake in this whole business was not trying to find a more capable candidate in a similar vein and ultimately wasting another two years by panicking, doing a complete 180 and appointing Russell Martin II.

Reply Like

Avatar of Andrew - North Hill
Andrew - North Hill

Lee Trundle

1,744 messages 1,469 likes

Correct, but the bottom line is Coleman was always part of the problem and eventually became our biggest one. January did for him.

We've had quite a few executives in the last ten years and most have not been very good, but this guy was the most out of his depth. Woefully unqualified to have been doing the job he was doing. I hope we never find ourselves in that predicament again.

Reply Like

R
Ringwood

Mel Nurse

2,303 messages 768 likes

Judge me by my actions he said...

Indeed...

Reply Like

b
bakajack

Roger Freestone

6,071 messages 1,408 likes

Coleman might be a fine businessman (I know little about his business dealings) but he never understood that football simply works differently to most financial institutions.

He compounded that problem by recruiting badly in terms of staff beneath him who ultimately turned out to be yes men and as badly out of their league as he was. This led to several catastrophic transfer windows and while Kaplan and co were so far detached from the club that they simply didn't care the new ownership made a brave (but no less difficult despite that) decision to demand the man that played a huge part in bringing them in and ending the old regime step down.

I never doubted his desire to succeed at the club, that came across plenty and he gave the fans more time of day in his two years or so as chairman than the owners had in the (what? Eight? Nine? Ten?) years that Kaplan and co had owned the Swans.

He was sadly simply out of his depth and the people he recruited to aid him similarly so. Ultimately the buck for off field circumstances ended with him and his departure became inevitable after the last January window.

Reply Like

click to expand...