• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

ARQS's latest activity

  • A
    ARQS replied to the thread SHEEHAN SACKED.
    I don't disagree... But there are plenty of players in the championship who would be able to have an active place in a premier League...
  • A
    ARQS replied to the thread SHEEHAN SACKED.
    We'll have a bit of a bounce first where the opposite will be true and everyone can say it was clearly Sheehan to blame and not the...
  • A
    ARQS reacted to MrSwerve's post in the thread SHEEHAN SACKED with Like Like.
    I could understand that if we were going after proven successful managers at this level, but look at our last 3 appointments. They would...
  • A
    ARQS reacted to CurtessECarr's post in the thread SHEEHAN SACKED with Like Like.
    I don't like this ''Set to sack the manager.'' I should just be announced ''Have sacked their manager''. when it has happened.
  • A
    ARQS replied to the thread SHEEHAN SACKED.
    Wonder what sort of relationship Brendan had with him?
  • A
    ARQS replied to the thread Is the Team/Squad balanced?.
    The biggest issue is the lack of a number 10 imo
  • A
    ARQS replied to the thread Sheehan VS O'Dea?.
    Absolutely. IMO we need to be open to anyone coming through the door. We've had a stream of managers in designer hoodies, skinny jeans...
  • A
    ARQS reacted to Professor's post in the thread Sheehan VS O'Dea? with Like Like.
    It's almost like a Monte Carlo statistical experiment. We run the same experiment with a slight change in variables expecting to see a...
  • A
    ARQS reacted to Dr. Winston's post in the thread Sheehan VS O'Dea? with Like Like.
    I'm veering towards a "Clear the lot of them out" approach. Maybe foolishly when it comes to Margetson, but a completely fresh approach...
  • A
    ARQS replied to the thread Poll, Sheehan In/Out/More Time.
    Exactly this. The wing backs allow us to get in a Number 10 but the slight issue with that is, we don't have one. The other issue is...
  • A
    ARQS reacted to Dr. Winston's post in the thread Poll, Sheehan In/Out/More Time with Like Like.
    He wanted to play with three central midfielders and no #10. That was duller to watch than a Rugby game so he's had to change it. Of...
  • A
    ARQS replied to the thread We want Sheehan out.
    It's also not true. If anything, the fans are more 'civil' today than they used to be. I can remember loads of occasions down the Vetch...
  • A
    ARQS replied to the thread How I see it.
    I don't disagree. I just wonder if he thinks we'll eek out enough points being very cautious etc
  • A
    ARQS reacted to sit_down_jack's post in the thread How I see it with Like Like.
    He didn’t get too close but he looked like he started to approach and then everyone started booing so he backed off. He gestured as if...
  • A
    ARQS replied to the thread There's a trend here we have to break for the future.
    I think we should just be totally open to who wants the job, listen to what they have to say and make a decision based on whether they...
Show older items

Members online

Total: 400 (members: 2, guests: 398)
Most visitors online was 16456 , on 19 Nov 25

Swansea City v Oxford United

Share this page

Back
Top