Rachel Reeves

[waynekerr55]

There's certainly more of a right leaning narrative to their news output

- Kuenssberg and her pathetic teenage crush on Johnson
- Mason acting as BBC's Reform spokesman
- Fiona "Stanley Johnson only slapped his wife once" Bruce
- Robbie Gibb's interference from the board.

And, back on point. The Guardian is probably one of the few left - leaning news outlets. There aren't that many

 

[rockinj]

The thing is it’s not a right or left wing thing. It’s a question of fairness.

Before his populist age there was more of a sense of fair play. But the tribalism now is off the charts.

Brexit, Johnson, trump etc etc its all skewed

 

[rockinj]

And this idea that the Chancellor should know every fine detail of every financial matter. Come on give your head a wobble.

 

[MajorR]

And this idea that the Chancellor should know every fine detail of every financial matter. Come on give your head a wobble.

Absolutely. She’s just been appointed to a major position in Government, has to sort out the finances, get her feet under the table get her team moving etc etc meanwhile the letting agent has been asked to sort the licence out, has agreed to organise it but failed to follow through and she’s being hung out to dry. It’s a nonsense.

 

[Pompeyjack]

And, back on point. The Guardian is probably one of the few left - leaning news outlets. There aren't that many

Thank you Wayne , I will try The Guardian too. I do like to read "both wings" so that I can get both interpretations of a story.

 

[PSumbler]

In a world where I suspect that at least 600 of the politicians that were elected to "serve" are probably doing some things that they shouldn't be for their own personal gain I find it incredible we have a 10 page thread on whether the chancellor should resign over a letting agent failing to set up a necessary licence.

As has been pointed out should she resign/be pushed now the impact on the economy would hit many of us and possibly to the tunes of tens of thousands of pounds when the markets react.

It's just nonsense and pretty much standard of how we work in the UK these days - the media start a witch hunt and loads jump on it with no real understanding of why or the longer term impact,

 

[Pentyrchjack]

Not sure why Reeves would move out of the family home and rent it out when the Chancellor's position could be reshuffled at any point, thus losing the grace and favour properties at her disposal.

Doesn't strike me as good planning.

 

[monmouth]

Not sure why Reeves would move out of the family home and rent it out when the Chancellor's position could be reshuffled at any point, thus losing the grace and favour properties at her disposal.

Doesn't strike me as good planning.

. FFS

 

[MajorR]

Not sure why Reeves would move out of the family home and rent it out when the Chancellor's position could be reshuffled at any point, thus losing the grace and favour properties at her disposal.

Doesn't strike me as good planning.

Get a grip mun, it makes total sense to rent it out. We’re talking about extra cash to the tune of £3k per month.
Do you honestly think Starmer would reshuffle his cabinet that soon, and if he did she’d probably get another post within the cabinet. There’s plenty of other government properties that could accommodate her short term.