Search results

Not one single person has said that. It’s like you’re having this conversation in your head and Darran is egging you on. God only knows why. Stop getting led up the garden path mun.

OMG! If the BBC has to pay for something where do you think the money comes from? Sky?

Honestly Dar, you know what he was asking and you know how daft it is, don’t be so mean.

That’s a different question to your initial point. If that happens the BBC pay out of licence fee money, are you really asking this question?

If he wins a court who do you think should pay then, if not the BBC? Channel 5?

Been a while since we’ve had our tails up. 😂 Incredible, and there’s enough dumbos around to make it seem legitimate.

Been a while since we’ve had our tails up. 😂

He’s not supporting you. You’re saying that the people who fund the BBC shouldn’t have to pay if Trump wins a court case. Darran is saying that Trump shouldn’t get any money, regardless of where it comes from. Your point is incoherent anyway so it’s irrelevant, but we covered this earlier anyway.

😂 eewww.

I understand that, I thought we’d addressed that earlier. I can’t offer any further help with this.

Who should they be grovelling to to appease Trump? And what does this grovelling look like? Money? They’ve already apologised and two of the most senior people have gone. What do you want to happen?

Some questions for you. If the resignation of the chief and head of news and an apology isn’t enough tell me what you think should happen next? Should he get money? How much? Who should they be grovelling to?

To anyone who wants to see Trump drag the BBC down to stop people looking the other way. Who should they be grovelling to Dar?

No wonder you’re advocating Trump getting billions for a dodgy edit if you feel you’ve been abused. I understand now.

Don’t be so daft. Lower your excitement levels and stop being a wally.

You just said an apology had nothing to do with it? Who should they be grovelling to. Personally I think they should stick the proverbial two fingers up.

Its relevant because if he sues it is for damages, call it what you want, but I agree he BBC has fucked up and caused its own problem but it’s done and dusted.

It was wrong, bang to rights. But it didn’t alter the narrative and caused him no harm. It’s bullshit and distraction tactics.

So you think he should get money?! Dear me.

They have been held to account. The chief and head of news have gone and they’ve apologised. Am I understanding that people here think that the convicted felon and rapist should be getting thousands of millions of UK licence payers money because the Beeb hurt his feelings? People need to...