Most visitors online was 16456 , on 19 Nov 25
Latest activity
-
PI took ‘they’ to mean the Labour Party in the post I was responding to. Starmer won’t last the year.
-
PPompeyjack replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.Hi Lisa 👋, and that is exactly why they don't give a flying f**k about the people who voted for them on the vast majority who want...
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.I’m unsure whether he can turn it around. It depends who the successor would be. And I wouldn’t trust the Labour membership to chose the...
-
PThey can get rid of him, but there'll be another goon taking his place, I'd love to see him Reeves, Lammy and Miliband gone!
-
Reeves can't go anywhere as she's let her house out... -
Smurph replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.The response to the budget is going to be interesting.
-
PWe got career politicians these days the days of actual politicians are long gone, they all aspire to higher greater things.
-
Pentyrchjack replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.Reeves can't go anywhere as she's let her house out... -
I’ve said before that I understood the reasons for the appointment, although it wouldn’t have been my choice, but I have to say that... -
SAgree with this Lisa and isnt sort of good to know there is "one of us" that is a fan there in a key post who cares.... As you say Lisa...
-
exiledclaseboy replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.No Labour PM has ever been unseated but their own party. That’s usually a Tory thing. It would be a mental thing to do IMO. -
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Kim Hellberg.I understand why people would think that but I wouldn’t have made the choice. Anyway, I very much hoped that he’d prove to be a...
-
VI wouldn’t go that far… 😂
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Adam Worth.That’s not him
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.Oh, in which case you may be right. Although Reeves wont go soon. The market response would be hugely damaging.