The owners broken promises only create further mistrust

Tuesday, 1 February 2022, 13:27
5
4 mins read

Well this mornings column inches made for some pretty dismal reading for Swans fans as the local journalists put pen to paper over the charred remains of the transfer window or more to the point about the deals that never happened that we thought should.

It put a clearer perspective over some comments made by Russell Martin shortly after the Huddersfield game when he talked about a transfer target that never pulled through as he expected.

“I think what we have is a really clear strategy of what we want to do, long-term. We’re not asking for the world in January,” he said at the time.

“We’re really clear in what we want and how we want to do it.

“It’s just hopefully about getting enough support to be able to do that, like we did with Flynn Downes.ย  Hopefully we get the support we need and we can really add to it (the squad).”

They were the words then of a frustrated man and this morning it is clear to see why.ย  First, writing on Wales Online, Ian Mitchelmore wrote about the failed move for Matt O’Riley at MK Dons.ย  ย The ยฃ1.5m release clause for the player was well documented andย an attractive instalments package that would have seen the Swans pay just ยฃ300,000 of that fee up front proved insufficient in convincing the club’s owners to stump up for the 21-year-old. The remaining ยฃ1.2m would have been given to MK Dons in chunks across the next four windows, although it wasn’t to be.ย  The owners decided that it was not an investment they wanted to make in the squad, O’Riley went to Celtic and the rest is history.

The player though that Martin was referring to at that Huddersfield game was Ryan Longman.ย  ย A deal agreed with Brighton at ยฃ500k over four installments was in place and ready to be concluded to make Longman our third addition of the month but a late call from the States and the deal was pulled leaving the Swans and Brighton as equally as frustrated as each other.

Now don’t get me wrong.ย  I completely understand the need to balance the books at any club but this immediately feels more than this.ย  ย These are promises that seem to be made to a manager and a recruitment team allowing them to structure deals that get the players the manager wants.ย  ย And then the promises are retracted and the club – and the management team – look equally inefficient and frustrated at the lack of backing that has clearly on this occasion been promised.

It is the first – and sometimes only – step to a mis trust between management and club that never seems to end well.ย  ย Indeed, as the man tasked with making these deals happen I cannot imagine the position of Julian Winter feels overly comfortable that this is playing itself out in public.ย  Why did these deals get pulled at the last minute and why was a seemingly tight agreement on finances changed at the last minute.ย  ย We can only speculate on the answer but it does appear that the fault can only sit several thousand miles away right now.

Much has been said about our ownership group since their well publicised takeover of the club back in 2016 where they bought a majority share.ย  ย Their absence from the club has been as notable since our relegation from the Premier League with visits very infrequent at best (granted in the last two years Covid has not helped this.)ย  We saw Jake Silverstein over at the end of last year but does he have the power to approve these deals – my experience tells me that Steve Kaplan has always pulled the strings in the ownership group, there is nothing right now that suggests anything has changed on that front.

Russell Martin must be more than a frustrated man at the moment.ย  ย Nothing against the signings he did manage to bring in via this window but there are clearly two more he wanted in O’Riley and Longman and he didn’t manage to get either because someone – many miles away – decided that they did not want to pay that money even over four installments over the next two years.ย  ย Ladies and Gentlemen, is this really the next level we were promised?

It is difficult, if not impossible, right now to state anything positive about the way our ownership group has played the transfer window.ย  ย Everyone would have been aware of the job that Russell Martin wants to do here and the size of the task that means to bring in new players.ย  ย For everything we read it suggests that we, or more accurately he, has had the wool pulled from under him and now he sees his key targets playing at Celtic and Hull respectively.ย  ย That has got to do more than hurt.

As a club we have been massively let down by the owners, the manager has been let down by his employers.ย  The transfer window felt a bit deflating last night, this morning the grim reality of where it went wrong made for very depressing reading.

I am not sure now where we go from here.ย  The mis-trust that no doubt must exist has to be repaired and the backing that was taken away in January must be given back in the summer and this time not pulled away at the last minute leaving the manager feeling it is necessary to bring out his frustrations in post match interviews.

It is doubly frustrating when you consider that the rug is pulled by owners who have seen less than 5 matches in the flesh in the four years since we were relegated.ย  If the budget was agreed then they should not pull the rug because they do not like the terms.ย  Getting agreement to a ยฃ500k fee over four installments is well negotiated but what we see is someone thousands of miles away deciding that its not good enough for him.ย  ย And that is not acceptable, unnecessary interference from the top?

We are though today where we are.ย  ย It is difficult to be philosophical about it but I guess we have to be.ย  Russell Martin will make his views know, you assume Winter will as well. Maybe one day those that hold the purse strings will eventually listen.ย  ย Never go back on your promises.

Images courtesy of Getty Images, Athena Picture Agency and Swansea City Football Club.

5 Comments

  1. We need people interested, able and willing to invest in Swansea.
    Itโ€™s really depressing theyโ€™re not interested, many supporters donโ€™t want them isnโ€™t it about time they go.
    Are they just about to lose us another manager who is doing a decently job and working hard for us.

    • interested people … like those holding a 39% share in the club or even a 21% share.
      As for O’Riley – get real. He was always going to Celtic we were just being used to push up his contract.

  2. The Owners have a right of duty to protect and look after the investments made by the consortium and that is what they are doing! – If your investment doesn’t look like growing, or would damage your other business interests yo do not invest – only a fool or gambler would. So, sadly we have what we have a group of investors who will use the Club’s resources to stay in business. I’m sure if a couple of players moved out, they would have re-invested in replacements. Being in business myself within the sporting field, money is hard to find, with recent restrictions just think how much money has drained from the Club.

    We need to be realists, difficult times mean difficult and unpopular actions. As bad as I think the Yanks are as owners, at least they are not looking to put us into a financial hole and we must be thankful for that. We need to keep being jacks and support our team and hope for better days ahead, at least we are not burdened with the issues Derby, Cardiff and many others face by having owners who are wreckless!

  3. Oh come on. These owners are a disaster. We sold McBurney, James, Rodon, Roberts. What did that bring in? How much has been spent? The owners had a very good manager in Potter and failed to back him, a pretty good manager in Cooper and failed to back him. Now they have an unproven manager in Martin and they not only don’t back him. They sell him down the river. The joke is these owners were supposed to provide the funds to keep Swansea competitive in the Premier league. They aren’t prepared to invest for us to be competitive in the championship. Enjoy the inconsistent football because the club is going nowhere under these skinflints.

  4. It always the same with the owners of Swansea they offer the world to a incoming manager but when they sign they go against their word.get rid of them otherwise the swans will fall down the divisions..

Comments are closed.

Phil Sumbler

Been watching the Swans since the very late 1970s and running the Planet Swans website (in all its current and previous guises since the summer of 2001 As it stood JackArmy.net was right at the forefront of some of the activity against Tony Petty back in 2001, breaking many of the stories of the day as fans stood against the actions where the local media failed. Was involved with the Swans Supporters Trust from 2005, for the large part as Chairman before standing down in the summer of 2020.

NewsNow

League Table

Next Up

Forum Latest

Threads: 15,948

Messages: 237,861

Members: 2,706

Latest member: lynellbandy0142

Latest from Blog

Duff linked with return to management at Barnsley

Just about twelve months ago Michael Duff was Barnsley manager and looking forward to a play off final at Wembley against Sheffield Wednesday.ย  ย A late winner for the Owls condemned Barnsley to another season in League One but the work of Duff drew the attention of the Swans who, of…

Swansea City key dates confirmed for 24/25 season

The key EFL dates for the coming 24/25 football season have been confirmed with the first one being that fans will be able to plan their nine months ahead from 26th June when the fixtures are released at 9am that day. The Championship season may still be ongoing with the…

Swansea City set to make Notts County striker their top target?

Luke Williams spoke yesterday about his desire to bring in a striker this summer and it is relatively widely suggested that his former striker at Notts County, Macaulay Langstaff, will be that choice although it will cost a decent chunk to get him to SA1. After four months at the…

Don't Miss

Time to show our real hands – can Coleman and Watson show actions as well?

The transfer window is well into its last week already

Swans “Controlling Interest” claimed again but its just another LLC investment?

The situation of the club ownership has been a subject