Recent content by waynekerr55

And, back on point. The Guardian is probably one of the few left - leaning news outlets. There aren't that many

There's certainly more of a right leaning narrative to their news output - Kuenssberg and her pathetic teenage crush on Johnson - Mason acting as BBC's Reform spokesman - Fiona "Stanley Johnson only slapped his wife once" Bruce - Robbie Gibb's interference from the board.

Well, given their political lead Chris Mason hangs on every word that comes from Farage and the circa 150+ Tory appointments in 14 years, they certainly don't follow the charter. Lisa Nandy needs to get the metaphorical boot on their throat. For goodness sake, when are they going to realise...

It's the stupidity that I can't get. Both her and Rayner knew the press would be on them and still they fûcked up. Chronic stupidity. It's almost as irritating as the Labour party sucking up to the same media outlets who despise them and will never give them a fair hearing

To quote Warwick "I remember playing cricket with him, he was sound back in the day but now he's a quack"😂😂😂

Classic Gonzo in the end.

Phil Parkinson - how long does he have?

I've heard far worse theories, however we've no doubt shelled out big money this year

The thing is, with the outlay made this summer I don't think the board will allow him to amble along, or I'd be surprised if they did

Pay peanuts, get monkeys. Academy football is vastly underpaid at all levels.

Fortunately I chose to go to the gym 🤦🏼

Stop talking about American things and let's watch the greatest volley ever!

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cewnje717rqo If they did this, you wouldn't be able to get on Radio Wales

I think there are many reasons why it's a misstep 1 - we are allegedly "skint" yet there's money for this, which, inevitably, end up being designed and messed up by the usual suspects 2 - why feed theories about control, do they not know what's being said 3 - it won't fix any of these...