Search results

I totally agree that I see some AI articles and they are absolute crap. Here I reckon lazy people offer little original thoughts and just accept the first version they get ..and submit. The end result can often be seen for what it is - nonsense I see the first AI version as a draft ...

But I'm learning that the end product can be what YOU want to say, you have original thoughts, you're testing out on AI ..it can throw up some other inputs ( like brainstorming with a colleague) ..you might ignore some ; like some , maybe left field you'd not taken into account, delve deeper...

I've had a word with my Chat GPT mate and he's polished it up a bit for the Board "That’s a great analogy — it paints a vivid picture. Sheehan is regarded as a reliable, steady manager: he’ll take care of Swansea, keep things respectable, and won’t do anything reckless or adventurous. But at...

Well in the AI /my article, he is expected to have a pop in the New Year 😂

Don't blame me - Chat GPT loved it 😂 East Stand regular

As from my other AI article, I'm tending to this view ( surprisingly to me as an OAP+) The key for me is having a key set of issues you think may be relevant, the core for AI, it then tidies it up as far as I can see. Tbh I reckon I could have written " my" whole AI article not far removed...

Well that wasn't written by AI for sure ..I love a sausage role myself 😂

Thanks for the offer Phil, but it's ok here I think for the moment. . I'm just experimenting with this AI stuff. The first AI version I had contained some crap tbh so I either deleted or edited from my viewpoint. But framing the original query to Chat GPT I included some objective...

To balance out the top sticky, here’s an alternative view 😊 We have a nuanced situation regarding Sheehan’s Plan that many fans are picking up on, and why they are, for now, sticking with him based on his apparent pragmatic approach. The Pragmatic Foundation 1. Results over Performance: There...

I'm underwhelmed with the current squad and style of play. But on the AI articles, I'm not a fan tbh, I prefer incisive and objective fan input 😊 But if an article is AI created under the brief of "Swansea fans lose faith as Alan Sheehan faces growing pressure over poor form"....then for...

Could we have a "meh" option. That's for me unfortunately. I'm definitely underwhelmed. (Definition of meh....an adjective used to express indifference, lack of enthusiasm, or disappointment. It can be used to describe something as mediocre, uninteresting, or unexceptional, or to convey apathy...

F**k me. "Never bored watching us under Russell Martin" is one of the most amazing comments I've ever seen on this board . Each to their own I know, but in watching the Swans for some 50+ years, I was never so bored as under Russell Martin (a few games only excepted). Oh.. and frustrated and...

Brian Evans

Is spot on

Unfortunately this is spot on

If it's a boring film I'd leave early

Yep. I just want to see a culture change of a priority to get forward at pace more often, not hoof ball as such, but at least counter attack more often, shoot more often...and nothing wrong also with route one at times. Please bury tippy tappy, though it's not happening soon enough for me...

Oh yeh, forgot about that 😂. Should be no.1 priority of course..silly me !!😜

Yes. Football is, and should be, a simple game. Aim to win the game by scoring more than the opposition. Defend solidly to prevent or minimize the opposition scoring against you. In so doing : Doesn't need to be Brazil 1970 of course Cut out the tippy tappy sideways walking football crap...

Trott couldn't keep the Trotters out !!