• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Ben Brereton Diaz

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eddie70
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 8
  • Views Views: Views 2,496

Eddie70

Youth Team Apprentice
Joined
Jul 23, 2021
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
This is what happens when you let expensive assests run down thier contracts. Lets get Piroe done.

https://www.lancs.live/sport/football/transfer-news/villarreal-brereton-diaz-blackburn-transfer-27243751

"Rovers offered Brereton Diaz a new long-term and even short-term contract to try and keep him at the club. They rebuffed three bids last summer with no club meeting the owners' valuation of around £15million.

Now, he is a free agent"
 
Very few Championship clubs could afford to eat that kind of a loss.
We either tie him down to a new contract, gamble on him getting us promoted this season or sell him this window for 50-60% of his true value.
 
15m is one hell of a one season loan fee for zero success and I doubt they were going down without him.
 
bakajack said:
Very few Championship clubs could afford to eat that kind of a loss.
We either tie him down to a new contract, gamble on him getting us promoted this season or sell him this window for 50-60% of his true value.

We definitely don't go with the gamble option, that's exactly what Blackburn have done.

He's got to go or sign a new contract before the window closes.
 
Neath_Jack said:
We definitely don't go with the gamble option, that's exactly what Blackburn have done.

He's got to go or sign a new contract before the window closes.

I agree, but right now those are the three options in front of us.
£10-15m invested wisely is enough to cover 2 or 3 or maybe even 4 positions where we are sorely lacking players.
 
This is the frustrating thing with the modern game. Footballers have basically got clubs by the balls.
The Bosman ruling was the worst thing that could happen to clubs.
 
TerryPHELAN said:
This is the frustrating thing with the modern game. Footballers have basically got clubs by the balls.
The Bosman ruling was the worst thing that could happen to clubs.

The Bosman ruling was always going to happen sooner or later, preventing someone from plying their trade elsewhere even though their contract with you had expired was never going to survive legal challenges.
 
bakajack said:
The Bosman ruling was always going to happen sooner or later, preventing someone from plying their trade elsewhere even though their contract with you had expired was never going to survive legal challenges.

It seems crazy now that for so long, that was the status quo.

Things have gone too far the other way now with the amount of money in the game, but previous to Bosman, club owners were laughing all the way to the bank and players were screwed over.
 

Members online

Back
Top