Blocked from twitter

[Darran]

@jack is basically the owner of twitter. :lol:

 

[Darran]

This is @jack

 

[PSumbler]

Is there anything that happens on Twitter that you miss?

 

[exiledclaseboy]

Is there anything that happens on Twitter that you miss?

Bob Harris has gone into hiding.

 

[Darran]

Is there anything that happens on Twitter that you miss?

Bob Harris has gone into hiding.

Prick.

 

[Jackmanandboy]

On a wider note, Jack's decision to make editorial decisions is raising concerns from the likes of Merkel and Scott Morrison. It'll be interesting to see what comes from all this.

 

[exiledclaseboy]

On a wider note, Jack's decision to make editorial decisions is raising concerns from the likes of Merkel and Scott Morrison. It'll be interesting to see what comes from all this.

Twitter takes editorial decisions all the time and his since the very start.

 

[Neath_Jack]

People like that, and his attention seeking posts, should always be ignored.

That Blackadder chap seems a bit of knob as well.

 

[Monty]

I'm sure Jack is mortally wounded by the words of that nobody, hopefully his billions will help him heal

 

[DJack]

On a wider note, Jack's decision to make editorial decisions is raising concerns from the likes of Merkel and Scott Morrison. It'll be interesting to see what comes from all this.

Twitter takes editorial decisions all the time and his since the very start.

"Editorial decisions" is the latest phrase from conservatives who were previously happy with business's doing whatever they want and then it changes when anyone conservative falls foul.

 

[thefranchise]

On a wider note, Jack's decision to make editorial decisions is raising concerns from the likes of Merkel and Scott Morrison. It'll be interesting to see what comes from all this.

Making those decisions effectively makes them a publication, it's risky business for twitter who have always maintained that they are a platform for people and not a media company which limits their risk of being sued for what the platform is used for.

 

[Jackmanandboy]

Twitter takes editorial decisions all the time and his since the very start.

"Editorial decisions" is the latest phrase from conservatives who were previously happy with business's doing whatever they want and then it changes when anyone conservative falls foul.

Editorial decision making has been a core process for the free press since printing was invented, when to print or when not to print and the consequences of breaking the law by publishing something that is illegal or damaging. In this case by accepting an editorial role social media organisations open the door for legal responsibility for anything published on their sites. In the past they have denied that they have any such responsibility. The consequences of this responsibility for individuals and organisations are considerable and it could be argued that less information will reach the public domain as a result.

 

[Jackmanandboy]

https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6222343237001

 

[MajorR]

https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6222343237001

She tweeted an article stating the result of the election was hijacked, Trump has done the same in numerous occasions.
Trump was not banned for his tweets about the election being stolen, even though Twitter put warnings markers against them. Trump was banned because Twitter were concerned “due to the further risk of further incitement of violence.”

 

[DJack]

Editorial decision making has been a core process for the free press since printing was invented, when to print or when not to print and the consequences of breaking the law by publishing something that is illegal or damaging. In this case by accepting an editorial role social media organisations open the door for legal responsibility for anything published on their sites. In the past they have denied that they have any such responsibility. The consequences of this responsibility for individuals and organisations are considerable and it could be argued that less information will reach the public domain as a result.

Whoosh!

"Editorial descisions" is as I said it was, in the context of "Section 230 of The Communications Decency Act" as viewed (incorrectly) by conservatives.

This act protects all websites and all users of websites when there is content posted on the sites by someone else.

These people contend that the platforms, by moderating users (hate speech, racism, anti semitism and other conservative "talking points") are making "editorial descisions" and therefore publishers/media.

Conservatives (small c) dont like Section 230 but don't realise that if the proection is removed their views will face a lot more moderation/banning as the website is then likely to face litigation.