• ***IMPORTANT*** SOME PASSWORDS NOT WORKING

    There has been some issues with user passwords. Some users may need to reset their passwords to login to the forum. Please use the password reset option when logging in. If you do experience issues and find our account is locked then please email admin@jackarmy.net Thanks

Coronavirus: 18,000 test results published by mistake

TheLoneRanger

Ivor Allchurch
Joined
Jun 28, 2020
Messages
4,017
Reaction score
306
Location
Elephant Island, Antartica
Chief executive Tracey Cooper said ... She will not resign!!!


"The details of more than 18,000 people who tested positive for coronavirus were published online by mistake by Public Health Wales.

The health body said the data of 18,105 Welsh residents was viewable online for 20 hours on 30 August.

Most cases gave initials, date of birth, geographical area and sex, meaning the risk of identification was low, Public Health Wales (PHW) said.

However 1,928 people in living in communal settings were more at risk.

Nursing home residents or those living in supported housing also had the name of their place of residence published, meaning the risk, while still considered low, was higher.

The incident was the result of "individual human error" when the information was uploaded to a public server searchable by anyone using the site.

PHW said the information had been viewed 56 times before it was removed but there was no evidence so far that the data had been misused"




https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-54146755
 
TheLoneRanger said:
Chief executive Tracey Cooper said ... She will not resign!!!


"The details of more than 18,000 people who tested positive for coronavirus were published online by mistake by Public Health Wales.

The health body said the data of 18,105 Welsh residents was viewable online for 20 hours on 30 August.

Most cases gave initials, date of birth, geographical area and sex, meaning the risk of identification was low, Public Health Wales (PHW) said.

However 1,928 people in living in communal settings were more at risk.

Nursing home residents or those living in supported housing also had the name of their place of residence published, meaning the risk, while still considered low, was higher.

The incident was the result of "individual human error" when the information was uploaded to a public server searchable by anyone using the site.

PHW said the information had been viewed 56 times before it was removed but there was no evidence so far that the data had been misused"


Huge breach of GDPR and confidentiality.
Should be gone

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-54146755
 
Reassuring us that "the risk of identification is low" is simply a sleazeball way of saying that the risks of misidentification are higher.
 
Seriously its getting worse by the week. Our NHS is just not functioning to a reasonable standard, covid has just highlighted our Welsh Parliaments failures. Lets get rid.
 

Coventry City v Swansea City

Online statistics

Members online
26
Guests online
640
Total visitors
666

Forum statistics

Threads
17,885
Messages
256,136
Members
4,689
Back
Top