• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Does a profit tell a full picture of the financial health?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JA News
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 7
  • Views Views: Views 1,925

JA News

Michu
Joined
Sep 19, 2020
Messages
2,710
Reaction score
134
On Monday the Swans confirmed their accounts to July 31st 2020 which showed a pre-tax profit of £2.7m, a big jump from the £7m loss posted in the twelve months previous. The full impact of relegation from the Premier League was continuing to be shown through in the accounts with turnover down to £50m...

Read more
 
Interesting article.

"return at the first time of asking of Norwich, Watford and possibly Bournemouth increases that as it keeps their parachute payments inside the Premier League spread between the clubs there".

What is the actual rule surrounding this then?
 
Chief said:
Interesting article.

"return at the first time of asking of Norwich, Watford and possibly Bournemouth increases that as it keeps their parachute payments inside the Premier League spread between the clubs there".

What is the actual rule surrounding this then?


The money doesnt leave the Premier League so effectively gets split I believe

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-9513213/EFL-ask-Premier-League-70m-saved-parachute-payments-Watford-Norwich-promoted.html
 
Parachute payments that had been allocated but are not needed due to being promoted back to the premier league are given to the EFL to be split amongst clubs. It is for a similar reason that it is a traditional gentleman's agreement that the winner of the championship playoff final usually donates their share of the matchday income to the losing finalist.
 
"Parachute payments that had been allocated but are not needed due to being promoted back to the premier league are given to the EFL to be split amongst clubs".

I thought this too, but the articles suggest the money is shared amongst the Prem teams?
 
The articles in the press suggest a very opposite position

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-9513213/EFL-ask-Premier-League-70m-saved-parachute-payments-Watford-Norwich-promoted.html
 
Chief said:
"Parachute payments that had been allocated but are not needed due to being promoted back to the premier league are given to the EFL to be split amongst clubs".

I thought this too, but the articles suggest the money is shared amongst the Prem teams?

I'm certain this used to be the case. It wouldn't surprise me if the PL have changed that though.
 
NeathJack said:
Chief said:
"Parachute payments that had been allocated but are not needed due to being promoted back to the premier league are given to the EFL to be split amongst clubs".

I thought this too, but the articles suggest the money is shared amongst the Prem teams?

I'm certain this used to be the case. It wouldn't surprise me if the PL have changed that though.

It used to be the case yes, but only as a gentleman’s agreement to do so, never enshrined in any rules/laws, but that practice stopped a while ago i believe, not sure when.
 

Members online

Back
Top