• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

FA to be sued by Paquetta?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bakajack
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 4
  • Views Views: Views 418

bakajack

Roger Freestone
Joined
Jun 29, 2020
Messages
8,014
Reaction score
3,388

Not Swans related, but both Wet Spam and Paquetta himself lost earnings to the tune of tens of millions of pounds after his move to Man City collapsed when the FA announced they were charging him with spot fixing offenses.

Pretty flimsy evidence was used and the basis of it seems to come from betting information derived from their own ethics officer which hardly made him impartial.

Match fixers and cheats deserve everything that comes at them, but at the same time flimsy cases like this which ruined a player's dream move and potentially their entire career surely also have to be punished just as severely.
 

Not Swans related, but both Wet Spam and Paquetta himself lost earnings to the tune of tens of millions of pounds after his move to Man City collapsed when the FA announced they were charging him with spot fixing offenses.

Pretty flimsy evidence was used and the basis of it seems to come from betting information derived from their own ethics officer which hardly made him impartial.

Match fixers and cheats deserve everything that comes at them, but at the same time flimsy cases like this which ruined a player's dream move and potentially their entire career surely also have to be punished just as severely.

It does seem like they had a very flimsy case with no compelling evidence, just putting 2+2 together and getting 5. If it was as weak a case as implied there, then yeah, f*ck 'em; sue the crap out of them.
 
Let's be thankful it's the Premier League going after Man City rather than the FA...
 
Good for him, I hope it costs them a pretty packet.

Are they stupid or what, talking about unusual betting patterns, I like my footie bets and do take a look at the odd few tipsters on X and online, and these are free, but looking at some comments following a tip for example somebody to get booked, you will have multiple people prepared to back, which in essence is just a hunch by the poster.

This just seems a case of the bookies crying because they have to pay out!

They are quite happy to have refs ignoring blatant fouls, and give no free kicks. But cry about this Jeez. Of course it’s just a game of football, and the betting is just a sideline of it, but I think if they are going to question the integrity of a player over a yellow card, then they should start looking at refs, because they have a lot more say in the betting opportunities of a game.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top