• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Fisher

  • Thread starter Thread starter Magic_Michu
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 23
  • Views Views: Views 2,667
im obviously the only one who doesnt think hes that bad..

not amazing but certainly better than Hamer. Yes he has some poor passes but he probably makes twice as many as hamer would so more scope for mistake there
 
If he's Martin's man.. then we'll stay in this division..

Can't collect crosses
Suicidal passes
Nonexistent saving capabilities
Decision making unbelievably poor

We might as well stick Naughton in the sticks
 
Skippyjack said:
If he's Martin's man.. then we'll stay in this division..

Can't collect crosses
Suicidal passes
Nonexistent saving capabilities
Decision making unbelievably poor

We might as well stick Naughton in the sticks

That's how I feel. He is simply not a goalkeeper. He does nothing that goalkeepers need to do.
 
eteb said:
im obviously the only one who doesnt think hes that bad..

not amazing but certainly better than Hamer. Yes he has some poor passes but he probably makes twice as many as hamer would so more scope for mistake there

Yep your the only one.
 
I can’t remember the last time we had a keeper I had such little faith in…

… he just doesn’t seem like a decent shot stopper - which is the primary role of a goalkeeper.

He doesn’t command the area, his positioning is terrible and his distribution isn’t even that good.

Benda was a quality shot stopper and came well for crosses.
 
Wouldn't let him in the car park Saturday let alone anywhere else.
 
Watching the game yesterday, I'd say his main fault, as mentioned above, is that he doesn't command his area. He's very indecisive under the high ball and often stays rooted to the spot when he could come and catch, or at least punch. This breeds hesitancy and mistakes amongst our defenders.
If I was an opposition manager, I'd be telling my team to get high balls into our area at every opportunity.
How didn't Cardiff beat us?
 
Can anyone who has any goalkeeping expertise explain that second goal, and what Fisher-out-of-water was actually doing. A long hopeful 30 yard crossfield punt into the six yard box and a point blank volley. I fail to see how we would be any worse off there having no goalkeeper at all. He was invisible.
 
monmouth said:
Can anyone who has any goalkeeping expertise explain that second goal, and what Fisher-out-of-water was actually doing. A long hopeful 30 yard crossfield punt into the six yard box and a point blank volley. I fail to see how we would be any worse off there having no goalkeeper at all. He was invisible.

That's exactly what I'm on about, Monny. He starts to come for the high ball, then fatally changes his mind and steps back, giving the Reading player all the time he wants to volley it past him. He should have come for that ball with determination and clattered the forward if necessary.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top