Gary Neville

[Darran]

https://twitter.com/samanthataghoy/status/1578002825090580480?s=21&t=ZtpG4x4kGNRkrNczu9No2w

 

[JackSomething]

Writes for the Daily Mail and the Telegraph, appears on GB News, uses virtue-signalling in her tweet. Safe to file as a twat who should be ignored by anyone with a working brain.

 

[Best_loser]

Writes for the Daily Mail and the Telegraph, appears on GB News, uses virtue-signalling in her tweet. Safe to file as a twat who should be ignored by anyone with a working brain.

Darran shouldn't ignore her then

 

[Darran]

Writes for the Daily Mail and the Telegraph, appears on GB News, uses virtue-signalling in her tweet. Safe to file as a twat who should be ignored by anyone with a working brain.

So is she wrong about Neville then?

 

[Darran]

Writes for the Daily Mail and the Telegraph, appears on GB News, uses virtue-signalling in her tweet. Safe to file as a twat who should be ignored by anyone with a working brain.

Darran shouldn't ignore her then

Prick. :lol:

 

[Niigata Jack]

Darran shouldn't ignore her then

Prick. :lol:

I wouldn't call him a prick, for being bang on the money :lol:

 

[Glyn1]

Writes for the Daily Mail and the Telegraph, appears on GB News, uses virtue-signalling in her tweet. Safe to file as a twat who should be ignored by anyone with a working brain.

She's correct, isn't she. Someone "with a working brain" considers the arguments rather than the people who make them. There may be good reasons why Neville would do this, so let's hear them.

 

[JackSomething]

Writes for the Daily Mail and the Telegraph, appears on GB News, uses virtue-signalling in her tweet. Safe to file as a twat who should be ignored by anyone with a working brain.

She's correct, isn't she. Someone "with a working brain" considers the arguments rather than the people who make them. There may be good reasons why Neville would do this, so let's hear them.

It would be interesting to hear what deal he's taken and his reasons, but he's also done a documentary focusing on the conditions for those working in Qatar in the build up to the World Cup.

It's more that this is the standard operating procedure of the right-wing. If you're going to call out what you see as corruption and injustice, you have to be perfect. If you sympathise with refugees, you have to be willing to take them into your own home or you're a hypocrite. If you criticise tax dodgers, you can't ever have done anything even slightly dubiously financially. If you're well off and are on the left, you're a champagne socialist.

It goes on and on, while those on the right are almost championed for enriching themselves and their mates while screwing over the rest of us. It's pretty much the only argument they have, try to discredit the messenger, because there's not a lot about the message they can argue with.

 

[Darran]

Writes for the Daily Mail and the Telegraph, appears on GB News, uses virtue-signalling in her tweet. Safe to file as a twat who should be ignored by anyone with a working brain.

She's correct, isn't she. Someone "with a working brain" considers the arguments rather than the people who make them. There may be good reasons why Neville would do this, so let's hear them.

Great post Glyn and 100% spot on.

 

[Glyn1]

She's correct, isn't she. Someone "with a working brain" considers the arguments rather than the people who make them. There may be good reasons why Neville would do this, so let's hear them.

Great post Glyn and 100% spot on.

Actually JackSomething's latest post has persuaded me !

 

[Darran]

Great post Glyn and 100% spot on.

Actually JackSomething's latest post has persuaded me !

F*ck him he’s trying to bully me now his Scouse chum isn’t here anymore. :lol:

 

[JackSomething]

Actually JackSomething's latest post has persuaded me !

F*ck him he’s trying to bully me now his Scouse chum isn’t here anymore. :lol:

Yeah, he and I were best buddies over the years! :lol:

I think my use of 'positive' and 'negative' fans drove him nuts every time. He didn't see slating some of our players while we were running away with League 1 to be a negative thing. Not to mention calling out the nonsense he'd post about the city on his infrequent trips back.

To be fair, Glyn was right to correct me initially. Just because someone stands for ideas that repel me shouldn't stop me listening to what they have to say. I think my second post was a better reflection of my thoughts on the matter. Well done reeling me in on your OP Darran!

 

[Darran]

F*ck him he’s trying to bully me now his Scouse chum isn’t here anymore. :lol:

Yeah, he and I were best buddies over the years! :lol:

I think my use of 'positive' and 'negative' fans drove him nuts every time. He didn't see slating some of our players while we were running away with League 1 to be a negative thing. Not to mention calling out the nonsense he'd post about the city on his infrequent trips back.

To be fair, Glyn was right to correct me initially. Just because someone stands for ideas that repel me shouldn't stop me listening to what they have to say. I think my second post was a better reflection of my thoughts on the matter. Well done reeling me in on your OP Darran!

My pleasure. :lol:

This is another one.

https://punditarena.com/football/james-fenton/eric-cantona-david-beckham-qatar-world-cup/

 

[exiledclaseboy]

She's correct, isn't she. Someone "with a working brain" considers the arguments rather than the people who make them. There may be good reasons why Neville would do this, so let's hear them.

It would be interesting to hear what deal he's taken and his reasons, but he's also done a documentary focusing on the conditions for those working in Qatar in the build up to the World Cup.

It's more that this is the standard operating procedure of the right-wing. If you're going to call out what you see as corruption and injustice, you have to be perfect. If you sympathise with refugees, you have to be willing to take them into your own home or you're a hypocrite. If you criticise tax dodgers, you can't ever have done anything even slightly dubiously financially. If you're well off and are on the left, you're a champagne socialist.

It goes on and on, while those on the right are almost championed for enriching themselves and their mates while screwing over the rest of us. It's pretty much the only argument they have, try to discredit the messenger, because there's not a lot about the message they can argue with.

Great post and bang on.

 

[Baron Goblet]

Sammy spammy