• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

GLAREZS OUT

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swanjaxs
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 15
  • Views Views: Views 1,327
Yes they've let those poor supporters down the last 10 years.
https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/12535322/transfers-man-utd-top-man-city-psg-barcelona-and-arsenal-for-net-spend-over-decade#:~:text=United%20have%20recorded%20an%20eye,published%20by%20the%20Football%20Observatory.
 
CurtessECarr said:
Yes they've let those poor supporters down the last 10 years.
https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/12535322/transfers-man-utd-top-man-city-psg-barcelona-and-arsenal-for-net-spend-over-decade#:~:text=United%20have%20recorded%20an%20eye,published%20by%20the%20Football%20Observatory.

I don't think anyone would argue that they've spent plenty of money, it's how they've spent it that's the issue. Plus the whole loading the club with debt thing and taking large dividends every year despite poor results, a crumbling stadium, etc.

The rest of the league should thank the Glazers. If they had proper owners they could spend even more on players and maybe would even make some good signings. In that scenario, it would be between the 2 Manchester clubs every year as they'd have so much more money to spend than everyone else.
 
JackSomething said:
CurtessECarr said:
Yes they've let those poor supporters down the last 10 years.
https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/12535322/transfers-man-utd-top-man-city-psg-barcelona-and-arsenal-for-net-spend-over-decade#:~:text=United%20have%20recorded%20an%20eye,published%20by%20the%20Football%20Observatory.

I don't think anyone would argue that they've spent plenty of money, it's how they've spent it that's the issue. Plus the whole loading the club with debt thing and taking large dividends every year despite poor results, a crumbling stadium, etc.

The rest of the league should thank the Glazers. If they had proper owners they could spend even more on players and maybe would even make some good signings. In that scenario, it would be between the 2 Manchester clubs every year as they'd have so much more money to spend than everyone else.

If what i read last week is correct, they haven't put any money into the club, it's all loans. They have taken £1.5 billion out of the club.
 
Neath_Jack said:
JackSomething said:
I don't think anyone would argue that they've spent plenty of money, it's how they've spent it that's the issue. Plus the whole loading the club with debt thing and taking large dividends every year despite poor results, a crumbling stadium, etc.

The rest of the league should thank the Glazers. If they had proper owners they could spend even more on players and maybe would even make some good signings. In that scenario, it would be between the 2 Manchester clubs every year as they'd have so much more money to spend than everyone else.

If what i read last week is correct, they haven't put any money into the club, it's all loans. They have taken £1.5 billion out of the club.

Indeed and I've seen the suggestion made that they have no incentive to change anything as they continue to make plenty of money every year despite the lack of success on the pitch. No doubt they've had a hand in increasing revenue with their noodle partners and the like, but it's scary to think what they'd be like with owners like Man City's or Newcastle's.
 
Swanjaxs said:
Bye bye Harry McG 🖕😂

I feel a bit sorry for Slabhead. A perfectly decent PL centre-half, but he is in no way an £80m player. Man United's worst signing in a long, long list?

Liverpool's turn to be the 'crisis club' this week then...
 
JackSomething said:
Swanjaxs said:
Bye bye Harry McG 🖕😂

I feel a bit sorry for Slabhead. A perfectly decent PL centre-half, but he is in no way an £80m player. Man United's worst signing in a long, long list?

Liverpool's turn to be the 'crisis club' this week then...

Totally lacking in the middle of the park, they can’t rely on Tiago due to his injury record, Kieta is another plus he doesn’t want to be there and Matip is another plus Konate is also injured neither is a midfielder l know, but that’s 4 regulars out injured they need to sign a top performing midfielder.
 
Niigata Jack said:
JackSomething said:
I feel a bit sorry for Slabhead. A perfectly decent PL centre-half, but he is in no way an £80m player. Man United's worst signing in a long, long list?

Liverpool's turn to be the 'crisis club' this week then...

Totally lacking in the middle of the park, they can’t rely on Tiago due to his injury record, Kieta is another plus he doesn’t want to be there and Matip is another plus Konate is also injured neither is a midfielder l know, but that’s 4 regulars out injured they need to sign a top performing midfielder.

They can have Grimes for just £35M.
 
J_B said:
Niigata Jack said:
Totally lacking in the middle of the park, they can’t rely on Tiago due to his injury record, Kieta is another plus he doesn’t want to be there and Matip is another plus Konate is also injured neither is a midfielder l know, but that’s 4 regulars out injured they need to sign a top performing midfielder.

They can have Grimes for just £35M.

Who's driving Joe, you or me? 8-)
 

Members online

Oxford United v Swansea City

Back
Top