Great Twitter thread on the window debacle

[Darran]

https://twitter.com/goddensa2/status/1621440776751153152?s=46&t=r7KHhq_o-8FiOKoNNc-uzA

 

[Neath_Jack]

Opened thread, saw who the author was. Closed thread

 

[Darran]

Opened thread, saw who the author was. Closed thread

Why?

 

[Neath_Jack]

Why?

I found him to be very obnoxious.
He was trumpeting no legal action the first time around. And now claims he didn’t.
When at that time I put it to him that the members should get a vote on legal action, his response was along the lines of “why should they”. And Mr Sumbler quickly jumped in saying the members would indeed have that vote.
He seems to have more to say about the Trust now, than he ever has before.
He is still trying to gain some weird kudos by saying he is ex chair in his bio.

Other than the above, nothing.

 

[Cinio Dydd Sul]

I found him to be very obnoxious.
He was trumpeting no legal action the first time around. And now claims he didn’t.
When at that time I put it to him that the members should get a vote on legal action, his response was along the lines of “why should they”. And Mr Sumbler quickly jumped in saying the members would indeed have that vote.
He seems to have more to say about the Trust now, than he ever has before.
He is still trying to gain some weird kudos by saying he is ex chair in his bio.

Other than the above, nothing.

Still worked to fulfill the wishes of the members despite initial doubts though didn't he? (Contrast to current board)

 

[Darran]

I found him to be very obnoxious.
He was trumpeting no legal action the first time around. And now claims he didn’t.
When at that time I put it to him that the members should get a vote on legal action, his response was along the lines of “why should they”. And Mr Sumbler quickly jumped in saying the members would indeed have that vote.
He seems to have more to say about the Trust now, than he ever has before.
He is still trying to gain some weird kudos by saying he is ex chair in his bio.

Other than the above, nothing.

I see.

 

[Risc]

Me and Ux have had bust ups on here, and on twitter, but that was a brilliant read and a good insight from someone who has been directly involved with these guys.

 

[Neath_Jack]

Still worked to fulfill the wishes of the members despite initial doubts though didn't he? (Contrast to current board)

He asked me the reason why I didn’t read it, and I gave it to him. No other interest in discussing it to be honest chief.

 

[Cinio Dydd Sul]

He asked me the reason why I didn’t read it, and I gave it to him. No other interest in discussing it to be honest chief.

Fine, I was only pointing out what I thought was an irrelevant and unfair criticism.

 

[Uxy]

I found him to be very obnoxious.
He was trumpeting no legal action the first time around. And now claims he didn’t.
When at that time I put it to him that the members should get a vote on legal action, his response was along the lines of “why should they”. And Mr Sumbler quickly jumped in saying the members would indeed have that vote.
He seems to have more to say about the Trust now, than he ever has before.
He is still trying to gain some weird kudos by saying he is ex chair in his bio.

Other than the above, nothing.

Well, that’s bollocks, but there’s no point me arguing about it.

Not the obnoxious part though, guilty as charged.