• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

One of the owners

  • Thread starter Thread starter magicdaps10
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 34
  • Views Views: Views 5,294
Wealthy owners don’t seem to have done Newcastle any harm or is it easier to get around the rules in the Premier League?
Our club could easily plough in tons of money like many clubs. But as obvious as this sounds, you are not just running at a loss, and I know we are already, you are risking and betting on players sales and other factors. It's a dangerous game and has back fired on many teams. It could of backed fired on Nottingham Forest when they signed the world, and by staying in the league etc, they got around it. Leeds will need to be promoted otherwise you cannot run a club like they have, as it will eventually catch up with them. Newcastle from what I beleive are not throwing money like Man City, although they could. They are, but not as much. Do a Man City? Not many would get away with what they have.
 
The club is losing £400,000 a week, so I doubt if they'll be looking to lose even more any time soon.
 
I think we'd have to prove that the Billionaire had no links to club ownership otherwise it would be seen to be a "contrived" income. A bit like the arguments over Etihad paying over the odds to sponsor Man City.
That's exactly what Citeh have been up to. Contrived income.
 
Wealthy owners don’t seem to have done Newcastle any harm or is it easier to get around the rules in the Premier League?
From what I've read fans believe that it's holding them back from getting really bonkers signings. They haven't spent that massively have they? Well, if you call 125m euros a year not bonkers.
 
It's the PSR rules that have basically stopped Newcastle doing what City did 15 years ago (and Chelsea 20 years ago) and just buying every other team's best players.

The rules are there to protect the established order and stop that happening again - the drawbridge has been pulled up behind them. If they weren't there Newcastle would easily have won the league by now.

It's not about "protecting the game", it's pure greed from the biggest clubs flexing their power to make sure they don't drop behind, and nothing else.
 

Members online

Back
Top