Schofield

[JustJack]

https://twitter.com/andrewmcb/status/1662169485896187918?t=Hsdhs46ZPnTYyYCPAQYWYQ&s=19

https://twitter.com/Shar_A_/status/1662183260678438921?t=gPSYStpPNFgOAQXrAYRn2A&s=19

 

[exiledclaseboy]

So apart from having a bit of a thing with a younger colleague, what has he done?

I did look the other day on Twits and all i could find was the normal anti-vax, anti-anything normal lot, going on about secrets coming out that everyone knows about. But when others were asking them about it, they were being told the normal "do your research" and "you won't find it in the msm". So I wrote it off as the usual headbangers claiming to know the truth. So, anyone?

Everyone on Twitter knows everything they just can’t tell you about it until after everyone else knows. Then they’ll tell you they knew all along. See JustJack’s recent contributions to this thread for reference.

 

[Darran]

He had his hand up Gordon the Gopher’s arse for years too.

 

[JustJack]

Everyone on Twitter knows everything they just can’t tell you about it until after everyone else knows. Then they’ll tell you they knew all along. See JustJack’s recent contributions to this thread for reference.

Its fairly obvious is it not?

The act or illegality of grooming is not negated once an individual reaches the age of consent.

A 50 year old individual cannot not provide gifts or hold a position of power over a 13 year old for 3 years in the aim of entering a sexual relationship on the day of their 16th birthday

Now I'm probably going to get called by Jimmy's solicitor.

 

[exiledclaseboy]

Its fairly obvious is it not?

The act or illegality of grooming is not negated once an individual reaches the age of consent.

A 50 year old individual cannot not provide gifts or hold a position of power over a 13 year old for 3 years in the aim of entering a sexual relationship on the day of their 16th birthday

Now I'm probably going to get called by Jimmy's solicitor.

You obviously seem to know more about it that me, which was kind of my point.

 

[monmouth]

Everyone on Twitter knows everything they just can’t tell you about it until after everyone else knows. Then they’ll tell you they knew all along. See JustJack’s recent contributions to this thread for reference.

I've seen some pretty explicit allegations about a 12 year old and superinjunctions that have just expired. I have seen no evidence that those allegations have any substance whatseover. On the basis of innocent until proven guilty, Mr S is entirely innocent. Should anything be proven otherwise he should be hung out to dry toot sweet.

The only thing he is clearly guilty of so far is cheating on his wife...and if we start stoning people for that...

Assuming the lad was of age, and there is no indication of illegal grooming, I suspect the fact that it was a younger man rather than a younger woman will cause greater angst amongst the outraged crowd and the gammons.

I certainly would lock him up for those we buy any car ads mind.

edit. He's done now career wise whatever, isn't he?

 

[exiledclaseboy]

I've seen some pretty explicit allegations about a 12 year old and superinjunctions that have just expired. I have seen no evidence that those allegations have any substance whatseover. On the basis of innocent until proven guilty, Mr S is entirely innocent. Should anything be proven otherwise he should be hung out to dry toot sweet.

The only thing he is clearly guilty of so far is cheating on his wife...and if we start stoning people for that...

Assuming the lad was of age, and there is no indication of illegal grooming, I suspect the fact that it was a younger man rather than a younger woman will cause greater angst amongst the outraged crowd and the gammons.

I certainly would lock him up for those we buy any car ads mind.

If there’s any allegation of illegality I’ve no doubt there’ll be an investigation and a charge. Especially in these post-Savile times. As I said, time will tell.

 

[Darran]

He had his hand up Gordon the Gopher’s arse for years too.

The look of innocence.

 

[monmouth]

If there’s any allegation of illegality I’ve no doubt there’ll be an investigation and a charge. Especially in these post-Savile times. As I said, time will tell.

Yeah, on reflection, no gagging order would have stopped the plod or ITV if it was potentially illegal and 'common knowledge', Shirley.

 

[exiledclaseboy]

Yeah, on reflection, no gagging order would have stopped the plod or ITV if it was potentially illegal and 'common knowledge', Shirley.

You’d have to ask Twitter. They knew all along.

 

[Skippyjack]

Well, that's a bit dodgy mate (thanks Inbetweeners)

 

[Darran]

I can’t lie mind I’ve never liked the smarmy twat.

 

[jack123]

You look at IMDB ratings before deciding to watch? Blimey, I bet you're a wow at parties!

:lol:

It's a bit of bad habit doing it, I know. I do find it a pretty good guideline though, when just about to tackle and old tv series that may be 40 plus episodes in length.

 

[J_B]

It's not a good look for a person in their 50s to be having a sexual relationship with a junior colleague in their teens.
Legal or not, that wouldn't be tolerated in many workplaces. All the while behind his wife's back and presenting a goody two shoes face to the world.
He's scum isn't he?

 

[monmouth]

You’d have to ask Twitter. They knew all along.

Well…

https://twitter.com/kaihumphries/status/1661431051166646287?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1661431051166646287%7Ctwgr%5Ea1be101b050817a4c9ad7f44ee92be1b02f8c9d4%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fnugwlad.freeforums.net%2Fthread%2F21978%2Fphillip-schofield%3Fpage%3D2