• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Season 23/24 | The Official Match Thread | Blackburn Rovers v Swansea City | The EFL Championship

  • Thread starter Thread starter jackharris
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 202
  • Views Views: Views 30,865

What will the result be against Blackburn?

  • Blackburn win

    Votes: 7 50.0%
  • Draw

    Votes: 3 21.4%
  • Swans win

    Votes: 4 28.6%

  • Total voters
    14
  • Poll closed .
Dr. Winston said:
I'd be tempted to play Key in the role Cullen is currently filling and keep Ashby further back. He looks more solid defensively than attacking.

Duff has already spent a fair wedge of cash. I certainly think we need a couple of additions, but January is a dodgy month to do business in even if you have confidence in your manager, which they plainly didn't in Martin.
Looking back over the years with these owners suggests there won't be much spending in January & deals can be expensive so that's fair enough.
That might change though if Southampton come back in with an offer for Wood & we can use that to bring in a midfielder/striker
 
Interesting that Ashby features positively in this thread. A few weeks ago consensus seemed to be he was the one disappointment among the new signings and we should return him at Christmas. Sounds like he is coming good? (I didn't see the game yesterday so grateful for your insights.)
 
cadleigh said:
Interesting that Ashby features positively in this thread. A few weeks ago consensus seemed to be he was the one disappointment among the new signings and we should return him at Christmas. Sounds like he is coming good? (I didn't see the game yesterday so grateful for your insights.)

He's looking a lot more comfortable as a straightforward RB than a WB.
 
cadleigh said:
Interesting that Ashby features positively in this thread. A few weeks ago consensus seemed to be he was the one disappointment among the new signings and we should return him at Christmas. Sounds like he is coming good? (I didn't see the game yesterday so grateful for your insights.)
Perhaps not coming good yet but was definitely better yesterday. I agree that key is an option at RW but I'm not against Cullen there.

Tymon has been disappointing for me (was a big fan of the signing at the time), so perhaps best to put key at lb but then that's arguably our best player out of position. Decisions decisions
 
Dr. Winston said:
He's looking a lot more comfortable as a straightforward RB than a WB.

Which is a bit surprising, as apparently he was scoring for fun for Newcastle in pre-season. Other than being told that (which may or may not be right) I didn’t know anything about him before he came here. He’s also supposed to be highly rated up there. Taking a bit of time to settle with us, but from what I’ve heard he could be good if he finds some form.
 
LeonWasTheDog's said:
Which is a bit surprising, as apparently he was scoring for fun for Newcastle in pre-season. Other than being told that (which may or may not be right) I didn’t know anything about him before he came here. He’s also supposed to be highly rated up there. Taking a bit of time to settle with us, but from what I’ve heard he could be good if he finds some form.

He looked very good going forward yesterday hence why I said that he or Key could switch during games to bamboozle the opposition
 
Dillwyn the Dog said:
He looked very good going forward yesterday hence why I said that he or Key could switch during games to bamboozle the opposition

The problem with playing both Ashby and Key on the right like that is that it will displace Cullen, and he was at the heart of almost everything good we did going forward that game.
 
Dr. Winston said:
He's looking a lot more comfortable as a straightforward RB than a WB.
Well he wouldn't be the first straightforward fullback we've to convert into a wingbac over the last few seasons. Definitely had his best game for us on Saturday though but if we are to try Ashby and Key in tandem, Key should be the one further forward imo, not Ashby and that would surely leave no place for Cullen despite his wonder goal at Blackburn unless he's played up front to give Yates a rest.
 

Members online

Back
Top