• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Snooker

  • Thread starter Thread starter jack123
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 27
  • Views Views: Views 6,876

jack123

Alan Curtis
Joined
Jul 18, 2020
Messages
3,941
Reaction score
546
i'm watching the welsh boy on the i player, Mcgill v Clarke, both not very good, but I hope he beats the ginge.
 
exiledclaseboy said:
They’re both pretty rubbish.


True, I couldn't believe the decision McGill made earlier, Clarke was well and truly snookered think it was behind the green, and Clarke made a miss, and instead of selecting to put the ball back in same position, McGill, played a rubbish safety shot.
 
jack123 said:
exiledclaseboy said:
They’re both pretty rubbish.


True, I couldn't believe the decision McGill made earlier, Clarke was well and truly snookered think it was behind the green, and Clarke made a miss, and instead of selecting to put the ball back in same position, McGill, played a rubbish safety shot.

The referee didn’t call a miss so McGill couldn’t ask him to replay the shot. There is no miss rule on a player when the other player requires snookers.
 
J_B said:
jack123 said:
True, I couldn't believe the decision McGill made earlier, Clarke was well and truly snookered think it was behind the green, and Clarke made a miss, and instead of selecting to put the ball back in same position, McGill, played a rubbish safety shot.

The referee didn’t call a miss so McGill couldn’t ask him to replay the shot. There is no miss rule on a player when the other player requires snookers.


Ah right, Watching on I player on pc , with no sound really, surely that was a miss though, seen shots like that called a miss, countless times.

Just noticed the point you make about the no miss rule, that may be it.. thanks
 
Grr well peed off the Welsh lad should have won, but he played crap,,
 
jack123 said:
Grr well peed off the Welsh lad should have won, but he played crap,,

McGill at the end trying to give it the big one. To be fair, Clarke was trying to talk and congratulate him.

The hooha yesterday obviously affected Clarke more than McGill. Deliberate tactic by the more experienced player?

Interesting now, McGill or Maflin in the semi, easy meat or new boys on the block?
 
BanosSwan said:
jack123 said:
Grr well peed off the Welsh lad should have won, but he played crap,,

McGill at the end trying to give it the big one. To be fair, Clarke was trying to talk and congratulate him.

The hooha yesterday obviously affected Clarke more than McGill. Deliberate tactic by the more experienced player?

Interesting now, McGill or Maflin in the semi, easy meat or new boys on the block?

McGill give it large at the end aswell when he won did he?
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top