• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Kyle Joseph

  • Thread starter Thread starter A4Jack
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 17
  • Views Views: Views 3,257

A4Jack

Alan Curtis
Staff member
Joined
Aug 7, 2020
Messages
3,554
Reaction score
655
Hull want him.

Now that was a poor deal.
 
All he needed was a chance but some reason we don’t like giving our players a chance.
McBurnie would have been expelled after his first few performances, if he’d have ever got the chance. When we get a decent coach, he has to try the yoof. It’d help our payroll too, one or two always come off and simply can’t be worse than some of our bench or starters. We can’t compete for better players so have go untried…try our own untried!
 
I couldn’t fathom this one out at the time. We had shelled out some decent money for him (£400k springs to mind), he had just come off a decent season in League One and he was only 22. There were surely other options for the Yates deal.
 
Yates is doing well enough at Derby. Not prolific, but his all round performances have their supporters purring. When you chuck Whittaker into the mix as well, it becomes very obvious that some of the coaches we've appointed recently have dropped the ball massively when it comes to player development.

One of the major reasons I quite often defend both Vipotnik and Bianchini is because the manager who fucked up so badly when handling Yates is in charge of the pair of them.
 
Last edited:
Probably not a shock that the two worst examples, Martin and Williams, both come across as the type to put short term personal advancement ahead of long term benefit of the club that they're being paid to manage.
Often the incentives aren't there for managers/head coaches.

I'm not sure what the average period in charge is for Championship managers these days, with a few exceptions it's probably 18-24 months or so. There's little incentive for managers to prioritize youth development as they'll be gone before you see the fruits of it most of the time. It needs to be a priority from the top of the club, and managers when hired need to be told that it is part of their duties to play and develop youth, not just token gestures here and there. There are clubs that operate this way, it's not a pipe dream.

Managers are only a few results away from the sack most of the time, so if they have the option of signing a seasoned pro or develop youth, it's a no-brainer, give me the pro. ideally those decisions should be taken out of their hands to an extent.
 
Would we have sell on assuming his age? I wiuld think so
 
Often the incentives aren't there for managers/head coaches.

I'm not sure what the average period in charge is for Championship managers these days, with a few exceptions it's probably 18-24 months or so. There's little incentive for managers to prioritize youth development as they'll be gone before you see the fruits of it most of the time. It needs to be a priority from the top of the club, and managers when hired need to be told that it is part of their duties to play and develop youth, not just token gestures here and there. There are clubs that operate this way, it's not a pipe dream.

Managers are only a few results away from the sack most of the time, so if they have the option of signing a seasoned pro or develop youth, it's a no-brainer, give me the pro. ideally those decisions should be taken out of their hands to an extent.

All very fair and probably accurate. Maybe why I'm coming around to the idea of prioritising an older head when it comes to LW's (eventual) replacement rather than a young up and comer.
 
Is it bad that I still yearn for the club to give Cameron Toshack a chance?
He has been out of work for some time though, no idea if he is still interested in the management game
 
Is it bad that I still yearn for the club to give Cameron Toshack a chance?
He has been out of work for some time though, no idea if he is still interested in the management game

He did a decent job with the youth, hasn't really succeed elsewhere.

Remove the surname and you wouldn't give him a second thought.
 
Wow
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250120_123320_X.jpg
    Screenshot_20250120_123320_X.jpg
    557.3 KB · Views: 15

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top