• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

US and Iran

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niigata Jack
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 107
  • Views Views: Views 3,138
Well done for the only European leader with the balls to stand up to Trump unequivocally, Pedro Sanchez of Spain.
The orange man baby is now threatening economic sanctions against Spain in retaliation. Go f*ck yourself, Captain Bonespur. I've already instituted my own sanctions against the US. No travel to the USA, no Maccy Ds, no bourbon, no Levi jeans 😂
 
Funny that bellend hegseth can talk about precision strikes, surgical strikes etc but has no idea who dropped a bomb on a girls school slaughtering students and teachers
Why would the slaughter of students and teachers in a place far away, be of even limited concern to the MAGA base? It’s a pastime in the US; couple/few thousand of their own kids get killed every year due to gun violence. They’ve become desensitised to max violence and their ‘commander in chief’ and his goons are the personification of that.
 
Perhaps it's time for women to take charge?
From what I understand through my past reading, Matriarchal societies are less aggressive and violent historically than Patriarchal societies, so you could well be onto something there.
 
From what I understand through my past reading, Matriarchal societies are less aggressive and violent historically than Patriarchal societies, so you could well be onto something there.
Yeah, women in charge could be good, just make sure Tulsi Gabbard and Kristi Noem are in charge of the Departments of Apple Pie and Soda Pop.
 
No mate, they're too emotional...
I would say that going to war is one of the most highly emotional and irrational acts that you can take, and it usually involves male decision making for it to happen.

Current societies and cultures are, by and large Patriarchal, so the Matriarchal mindset doesn’t get much of a look in, especially when war is involved.

The instinct of a rational person if they feel threatened by someone else, is to try and calm things down or in the politicians parlance de escalate the situation.

This is a defensive move, which can be referred to as the first line of defence, and is usually simultaneously accompanied by the decision to back away from the source of the threat whilst weighing up all options available to them.

If the danger continues to grow, and the person who is threatening the intended target/victim, begins to attack them, then there are two options normally available to fall back on, which is to fight or flight.

By any logical metric, only an idiot or lunatic would want to start or provoke a fight without reason as the consequences could be devastating for either or both parties involved.

The way I see it, for as long as there is a heavy Patriarchal leaning in world politics, that isn’t tempered by a more Matriarchal political influence as well, then the barbarism of war will be a constant thorn in the side of our beleaguered civilisation.
 
I would say that going to war is one of the most highly emotional and irrational acts that you can take, and it usually involves male decision making for it to happen.

Current societies and cultures are, by and large Patriarchal, so the Matriarchal mindset doesn’t get much of a look in, especially when war is involved.

The instinct of a rational person if they feel threatened by someone else, is to try and calm things down or in the politicians parlance de escalate the situation.

This is a defensive move, which can be referred to as the first line of defence, and is usually simultaneously accompanied by the decision to back away from the source of the threat whilst weighing up all options available to them.

If the danger continues to grow, and the person who is threatening the intended target/victim, begins to attack them, then there are two options normally available to fall back on, which is to fight or flight.

By any logical metric, only an idiot or lunatic would want to start or provoke a fight without reason as the consequences could be devastating for either or both parties involved.

The way I see it, for as long as there is a heavy Patriarchal leaning in world politics, that isn’t tempered by a more Matriarchal political influence as well, then the barbarism of war will be a constant thorn in the side of our beleaguered civilisation.
It is a sad day when I have to point out sarcasm on a British website.
 

The Next 6

League Table

Members online

Back
Top