Most visitors online was 16456 , on 19 Nov 25
Londonlisa2001's latest activity
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.You think she does her own social media accounts? My name still isn’t Lizzy btw.
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.Of course she told the truth when saying she was an economist. She has an educational background of being an economist and was an...
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.The vast majority of people break the law many times a year. Probably many times a month. Would you genuinely rather make people in...
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.You have no idea whether she lied on her CV given no one has seen it. The ‘lies’ were on a linked in account.
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.It was started by the Mail. Which is a very right wing media organisation. The BBC news team seems currently to be incapable of...
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.I don’t think she should resign. It’s a manufactured outrage.
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.I bet there will be a few words in the Reeves household tonight… lol.
-
LMine says she doesn’t trust me to do anything.
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Attendance.Don’t you think it’s actually a bit sad if a little kid can’t wear the kit of the team he supports though? Lots of youngsters support...
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Attendance.Bless him. A shitty, shitty disease.
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.The only thing she appears to have been guilty of to be honest is trusting her other half to deal with something instead of doing it...
-
LTidy👍
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.I wasn’t saying you were right wing. I said that the story was being driven by right wing media. They author the basic headlines. The...
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.He is an idiot. Stirring up shit for ratings. And he was so gleeful about ‘extra evidence’. That was before the ‘extra evidence’...
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.Dear God. The markets would go haywire. And borrowing would increase, and mortgages, cuts would be needed etc etc etc. She didn't...