sainthelens
Roger Freestone
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2020
- Messages
- 5,595
- Reaction score
- 401
monmouth said:I thought it was desperate. It's worse than that. They are claiming consequential losses as he definitely would have kept them in the PL. It's almost beyond even laughable, except when you think of how stupid they are in Cloud-Cuckoo Land.
Oh and it says this:
"...as FC Nantes must be held responsible for the accident organised by their agent"
Prejudicial, unproven, potentially libellous, and linguistically ludicrous.
Anyone ever 'organised an accident?'
Edit: Who knows what will happen if (I doubt they ever really will) facts are laid before a court. But there's no way they're getting more than the transfer cost back, even if they (unlikely) prove the balance of probablities that Nantes were complicit and responsible.
If they thought they had any case, they wouldn't have spent so much time and money trying to prove that he (always a bluebird mind) wasn't their player, and then made a spurious appeal against that decision.
I hope this drags them into oblivion, in reputation and substance. Defunct and regarded worldwide as scum.
Of course its Nantes' fault, this picture proves it.
Jesus fckn wept.