• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

Epstein Files

  • Thread starter Thread starter jack123
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 46
  • Views Views: Views 1,066
It’s funny how, with millions upon millions of video footage, photos and emails being released, that the same old usual UK suspects are spread across the news, i.e. Mandelson, Mountbatten Windsor.

It’s about time that the news outlets spread their wings a little on this one, and cast an eye over everyone that’s implicated, not just a select few who appear in the masses of evidence that’s been made public.
 
It’s funny how, with millions upon millions of video footage, photos and emails being released, that the same old usual UK suspects are spread across the news, i.e. Mandelson, Mountbatten Windsor.

It’s about time that the news outlets spread their wings a little on this one, and cast an eye over everyone that’s implicated, not just a select few who appear in the masses of evidence that’s been made public.

Flooding the media with reporting on these characters is a useful diversion for those who may be trying to keep a lid on their involvement
 
"Accidental" release of unredacted victims' photos, possible perpetrators' info was redacted. Hmmm
 
Last edited:
If I could be a fly on a wall I would be buzzing between the office of Starmer and the Mandelson household.
 
Is it only me that’s wondering whether there is an awful lot more to this? Could Mandelson have been chosen BECAUSE of his links. And that can’t be admitted because the US administration didn’t know.
 
You’re gonna have to explain that for me.
Well it seems to me that there are a couple of possibilities. One is that everyone knew damn well that Mandelson was deep into the Epstein business but he was put in Washington as a warning shot to Trump.

But the second possibility, and this is a bit out there but who knows any more, is that the whole Epstein thing was a Russian/ Israeli operation (that bit I’m increasingly convinced about) and there may have been people ‘inside’ that operation who were actually working for us. But Starmer couldn’t admit that if the US didn’t know, even if he means he goes as a result.

I think it’s possible, however unlikely.
 
Well it seems to me that there are a couple of possibilities. One is that everyone knew damn well that Mandelson was deep into the Epstein business but he was put in Washington as a warning shot to Trump.

But the second possibility, and this is a bit out there but who knows any more, is that the whole Epstein thing was a Russian/ Israeli operation (that bit I’m increasingly convinced about) and there may have been people ‘inside’ that operation who were actually working for us. But Starmer couldn’t admit that if the US didn’t know, even if he means he goes as a result.

I think it’s possible, however unlikely.
Excellent. You should turn that into a script. There’s a 9pm BBC Sunday night six parter there.
 

The Next 6

League Table

Members online

Back
Top