• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Galbraith

  • Thread starter Thread starter eteb
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 22
  • Views Views: Views 3,039
I do agree that Sheehan got his team lineup and tactics wrong for Boro, especially the second half after nullifying them for the first you could see they were there for the taking.
Was surprised to see the front 3 against Lorient as 2 No 10's Galbraith & Cullen with a right winger. Galbraiths a midfielder not a 10. Then Sheehan repeats it at Boro.

It meant EOM was totally ineffective because he had to drop back to be the left side of the midfield 3. Totally unbalanced team and playing 2 square pegs in round holes. EOM as LM and Ethan as a 10.

Hopefully that performance last night straightens things out
 
Was surprised to see the front 3 against Lorient as 2 No 10's Galbraith & Cullen with a right winger. Galbraiths a midfielder not a 10. Then Sheehan repeats it at Boro.

It meant EOM was totally ineffective because he had to drop back to be the left side of the midfield 3. Totally unbalanced team and playing 2 square pegs in round holes. EOM as LM and Ethan as a 10.

Hopefully that performance last night straightens things out
I can only rationalize the Lorient game by being a case of just giving minutes on the pitch to players to try to get them fit sooner for the Boro game than a discernable game plan. That would have held true if players were put into their correct positions at the Boro game itself but again Galbraith was deployed as the attacking midfield with a Fulton/Franco double pivot in midfield

As you said though hopefully with Inoussa, Eom, Franco, Galbraith all getting good minutes yesterday we will start to see players being deployed in their more natural positions. I would expect the Brighton kid to be on the bench for Saturday unless he is absolute fire in training
 
The single thing I loved the most about Galbraith’s performance was the tempo. I thought those days had gone with us losing Leon and Joey.
The speed with which he was able to get the ball under control, survey his options and make a pass was a joy to watch.
Also, a joy was his choice of pass. He always looked to take the most positive option, but when pressed he made sure to look after the ball.
Also noticeable was that the kid was perpetual motion, and always available to receive the ball. Contrast that with another central midfielder on our books, who is a pass backwards and watch merchant.
We absolutely have a player on our hands.
Fair play to the recruitment team, this player is absolute bank for us down the road. He justifies our new recruitment structure on his own!!
 
Sheehan seems to favour a 4–3-3 over (say) 4-2-3-1. If we do sign Malik, which players do you think will be first choice for the three MF roles out of Galbraith, Malick, Franco, Widdel and Fulton (answers may be different H and A)?
 

Members online

Back
Top