Most visitors online was 2766 , on 14 Oct 24
I like piesToo many fingers in too many pies clearly.
But not ones that have been fingered.I like pies
Jesus Glyn, don't do it mate, I taunted a few and was obliterated.But he's not the next Jimmy Saville. I know that's a low bar but he didn't physically assault anyone.
And quite rightly so.Jesus Glyn, don't do it mate, I taunted a few and was obliterated.
So with that logic a sexual predator needs to physically assault someone in order for the victim to be taken seriously?But he's not the next Jimmy Saville. I know that's a low bar but he didn't physically assault anyone.
I really don't like the bloke, always found him creepy, but is there evidence he is a sexual predator, or is he just a misogynistic twat? I really don't like trial by media nor the equivalences being drawn with much more serious offenders. I'm not saying this should be trivialised or ignored, 'men' like this need to face up and grow up and understand the effect their behaviour has on others.So with that logic a sexual predator needs to physically assault someone in order for the victim to be taken seriously?
I'm not saying that Wallace is in anyway shape or form a sexual predator. I'm not in control of all the facts to make that judgement. The allegations against him and they are just allegations do have a sexual context to them.I really don't like the bloke, always found him creepy, but is there evidence he is a sexual predator, or is he just a misogynistic twat? I really don't like trial by media nor the equivalences being drawn with much more serious offenders. I'm not saying this should be trivialised or ignored, 'men' like this need to face up and grow up and understand the effect their behaviour has on others.
BBC or production company should have addressed and killed this years ago. I'd imagine they are all still shit scared of 'the talent' and killing their golden geese.
How did you jump to that conclusion? Saying that he isn't Jimmy Saville doesn't mean that victims shouldn't be taken seriously, but there are different levels of offence, which should be judged on their own merits. I don't see why this is front page news all this week.So with that logic a sexual predator needs to physically assault someone in order for the victim to be taken seriously?