• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Gregg Wallace

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darran
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 92
  • Views Views: Views 14,033
Seems like there are plenty of people defending him in certain quarters, I always thought the guy was a scum and it seems like I was right.
 
But he's not the next Jimmy Saville. I know that's a low bar but he didn't physically assault anyone.
 
But he's not the next Jimmy Saville. I know that's a low bar but he didn't physically assault anyone.
So with that logic a sexual predator needs to physically assault someone in order for the victim to be taken seriously?
 
So with that logic a sexual predator needs to physically assault someone in order for the victim to be taken seriously?
I really don't like the bloke, always found him creepy, but is there evidence he is a sexual predator, or is he just a misogynistic twat? I really don't like trial by media nor the equivalences being drawn with much more serious offenders. I'm not saying this should be trivialised or ignored, 'men' like this need to face up and grow up and understand the effect their behaviour has on others.

BBC or production company should have addressed and killed this years ago. I'd imagine they are all still shit scared of 'the talent' and killing their golden geese.
 
I really don't like the bloke, always found him creepy, but is there evidence he is a sexual predator, or is he just a misogynistic twat? I really don't like trial by media nor the equivalences being drawn with much more serious offenders. I'm not saying this should be trivialised or ignored, 'men' like this need to face up and grow up and understand the effect their behaviour has on others.

BBC or production company should have addressed and killed this years ago. I'd imagine they are all still shit scared of 'the talent' and killing their golden geese.
I'm not saying that Wallace is in anyway shape or form a sexual predator. I'm not in control of all the facts to make that judgement. The allegations against him and they are just allegations do have a sexual context to them.

My original response highlighting that you don't need to physically assault someone to be a sexual predator and a victim is a victim regardless of physical harm being involved.

This is my last comment on this rather disturbing thread.
 
So with that logic a sexual predator needs to physically assault someone in order for the victim to be taken seriously?
How did you jump to that conclusion? Saying that he isn't Jimmy Saville doesn't mean that victims shouldn't be taken seriously, but there are different levels of offence, which should be judged on their own merits. I don't see why this is front page news all this week.
 
Actually rereading Smurph's comment I seem to be in agreement with him, so I'll stop talking as well.
 

Members online

Back
Top