Ross said:
I find it wild that so many on this forum were calling for Martin’s head. Some of the vitriol I’ve read on here directed at him has put me off this site completely.
Knee jerk sackings in the midst of bad runs is something all clubs need to start avoiding. People go on about how owners are so trigger happy these days, but most of the time it’s down to the type of clown that posts on this forum unable to handle a few losses and shouting loudest from the stands.
Thank good the yanks didn’t listen to the type of moron who posts on this forum. (Just about the only thing they’ve done right).
I get what you’re saying in part, but, forums are a place to have opinions, opinions are not right nor wrong, merely expressing a feeling, you also have to see that some of the vitriol you speak of, was born of pure frustration.
I’m of the same opinion as yourself as to when a manager should be sacked, the reasonings I called for it in the midst of the Melee though, was the seemingly final kinda nail at that time, after the Rotherham match, when he gave that Ill advised interview which bordered on bizarre and “attacked” fans, who only really vented at the final whistle, I think a vast majority whilst we play have been shouting and singing support even though they’ve been disgruntled.
Many factors haven’t helped Martin either, owners and transfers alike, I don’t always personally like the heavy possession based affairs that ended with zero product, but yesterday I humbly admit it showed us it can and does work.
I think that mediocrity period we witnessed was in the middle of a storm where we were absolutely in free fall almost, and now somehow we are extremely slim play off candidates, so Martin has to be lauded for that also.
I don’t think these owners would read a forum and act on it, and those that have expressed “vitriol” are entitled to that platform, this is the very place to do it, as with all speech if there’s a “consequence” though, you yourself can combat that if you wish, but I’d not view them as clowns, just fans with a differing opinion.