• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

Keir Starmer

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrSwerve
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 259
  • Views Views: Views 4,971
Let’s be honest as soon as you go against the lefty grain on here you start to get ridiculed.
There’s not one person on here that’s seen Zack being interview and looked at the tv and thought wtf is he talking about,you either haven’t seen his interviews or you’re lying.

The second point and I’ve said this many times in the past is that when you ask a simple question on here nobody will give a simple answer much like Zack so go on answer this question……..

Can a biological woman have a penis?
I saw several of his overnight/early morning interviews and I thought that he spoke very well. Or at least it was ok in the context of the by-election result. He gets into trouble with me when he starts talking about legalisation of drugs, growth and investment (and can a woman have a penis).
 
I saw several of his overnight/early morning interviews and I thought that he spoke very well. Or at least it was ok in the context of the by-election result. He gets into trouble with me when he starts talking about legalisation of drugs, growth and investment (and can a woman have a penis).
It’s okay for your mate to call others who he doesn’t agree with as oddball, but when someone turns that back on him and his ilk, he starts crying.
 
It’s okay for your mate to call others who he doesn’t agree with as oddball, but when someone turns that back on him and his ilk, he starts crying.
My mate? Isn’t Darran your mate as well?
 
Burnham winning the seat or Labour getting trounced into third place; which one puts Starmer in a more precarious position?
On those results, Burnham wouldn't have won, he would just have reduced the size of the defeat. The voters wanted to give Labour a kicking and they certainly did that.
 
On those results, Burnham wouldn't have won, he would just have reduced the size of the defeat. The voters wanted to give Labour a kicking and they certainly did that.
His campaign would have been very different to that of the candidate who stood. A Green win would not have been a forgone conclusion.
 
On those results, Burnham wouldn't have won, he would just have reduced the size of the defeat. The voters wanted to give Labour a kicking and they certainly did that.
I wouldn't be so sure, if voting Burnham in to a seat they hadn't lost for the best part of 100 hundred years meant the was a chance of a leadership contest the result might have been very different.
 
Burnham is a hugely popular figure in the Manchester area. Many didn’t want him to stand because they didn’t want to lose him as mayor, fearing a reform mayor to replace him.
 
Imagine Polanski vs the likes of Putin and Xi... :ROFLMAO: :oops:
Don't worry mun, Brazil and Mexico will have our back, despite the fact that (lefty's and pinko's don't do that!) 'stark reality' will mean that those 18 helicopters won't last beyond a day or two at the most, and then there is the logistical impossibilities of constant supply/re-supply!!!!

5,500 to 5,900 miles away is some distance to aid an ally in an ocean patrolled by enemy submarines.

BUT, its all about the 'esprit de corps' mun, because no doubt Polanski noticed the tough time Richard Widmark and John Wayne had in The Alamo movie. The Mexicans were well and truly on top of their game in 1836!!!!

And when is the next Mexican 'presentation of colours'? I bet that'll be impressive LOL!
 
Back
Top