• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Liverpool unhappy with Swans

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swansea93
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 9
  • Views Views: Views 3,429

Swansea93

Roger Freestone
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Messages
5,594
Reaction score
1,607
Nat Phillips was on the brink of joining Swansea on deadline day and had permission to agree personal terms with them, but they signed Bennett and Latibeaudiere instead. The Liverpool hierarchy were less than impressed by how the Welsh club conducted themselves and messed Phillips around [James Pearce]

He only went on to have man of the match yesterday.
 
I don’t really care if they’re happy or not. It is good to hear that our recruitment team were more focused on doing the right thing for Swansea as opposed to committing to develop their player.
 
GixerJack said:
I don’t really care if they’re happy or not. It is good to hear that our recruitment team were more focused on doing the right thing for Swansea as opposed to committing to develop their player.

Nat Phillips was supposed to be a permanent deal probably around 1M, so if we got Bennett for free then that's the reason we didn't go ahead imo.
 
Blackpooljack said:
Bit like they fuked us around over re-signing Brewster

Exactly, and pricing us out of Harry Wilson.
 
Swansea93 said:
GixerJack said:
I don’t really care if they’re happy or not. It is good to hear that our recruitment team were more focused on doing the right thing for Swansea as opposed to committing to develop their player.

Nat Phillips was supposed to be a permanent deal probably around 1M, so if we got Bennett for free then that's the reason we didn't go ahead imo.

I'd have been amazed if we had spent £1m on him. I just don't think we have that kind of financial fee on top of the wages
 
I'm sure I speak for many when I say...
Fck off you scouse cvnts.
 
sainthelens said:
I'm sure I speak for many when I say...
Fck off you scouse cvnts.

But its not scouse who are making the decisions is it but a German with American owners.

Personally,Im over the moon when any of the so called big 6 get unhappy.

Klopp needs to humble up and accept the fact the big 6 do not have full sway over us all.

I was annoyed with the way Brewster was mishandled and he wont be doing his career much good where he ha gone. He wanted to go to a London club anyway so sod off Jurgen
 
PSumbler said:
Swansea93 said:
Nat Phillips was supposed to be a permanent deal probably around 1M, so if we got Bennett for free then that's the reason we didn't go ahead imo.

I'd have been amazed if we had spent £1m on him. I just don't think we have that kind of financial fee on top of the wages
This was the media figure being thrown about at the time, so yeah can see why we went for the freebies.
 

Members online

Back
Top