• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

patto

  • Thread starter Thread starter eteb
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 23
  • Views Views: Views 2,502
J_B said:
legoman said:
I'm not clever enough to understand the details of footballers contracts. But, in any other job if you refused to work you would be disciplined and sacked. Why does it seem this sanction is not available to football clubs?

For the sake of clarity,y point is a general one and I make no judgement on what may or may not be happening with Pato

You wouldn’t be disciplined and sacked if you claimed your mental health was an issue for work reasons even if it wasn’t.

My Mrs is big in the union so we know plenty of people who this exact thing has happened to them and they do have mental illness, one friend is in the middle of a court case with Cardiff Council. You'd be surprised.
 
J_B said:
legoman said:
I'm not clever enough to understand the details of footballers contracts. But, in any other job if you refused to work you would be disciplined and sacked. Why does it seem this sanction is not available to football clubs?

For the sake of clarity,y point is a general one and I make no judgement on what may or may not be happening with Pato

You wouldn’t be disciplined and sacked if you claimed your mental health was an issue for work reasons even if it wasn’t.

But leaving by "mutual consent" could come into play.
He's hardly on minimum wage now is he?
 
STID2017 said:
Swanjaxs said:
57c496efb6fa0217008b4840.jpg
You do realise that was meant as a joke right ?
Not sure the Willy Wonka reference is called for ?

Yes, I did realise it was a joke actually, you do realise my reply was also a joke right? :lol:
 
Glyn1 said:
legoman said:
I'm not clever enough to understand the details of footballers contracts. But, in any other job if you refused to work you would be disciplined and sacked. Why does it seem this sanction is not available to football clubs?

For the sake of clarity,y point is a general one and I make no judgement on what may or may not be happening with Pato

But I don't know of any other job where your boss can extend your contract against your will and also refuse to give you a pay rise.

I mean he was more than willing to sign the contract when there were no other offers on the table. Has a good 4 months and thinks he is better than he is.
I am so surprised he hasnt gone.
 
Glyn1 said:
legoman said:
I'm not clever enough to understand the details of footballers contracts. But, in any other job if you refused to work you would be disciplined and sacked. Why does it seem this sanction is not available to football clubs?

For the sake of clarity,y point is a general one and I make no judgement on what may or may not be happening with Pato

But I don't know of any other job where your boss can extend your contract against your will and also refuse to give you a pay rise.

Ah, so what was included in Pato's contract then? Do you think he wasn't aware of its terms before he signed? Do you think the club have driven a coach and horses through the contract terms then? Genuine questions.
 
Swanjaxs said:
STID2017 said:
You do realise that was meant as a joke right ?
Not sure the Willy Wonka reference is called for ?

Yes, I did realise it was a joke actually, you do realise my reply was also a joke right? :lol:

Seemed a bit personal .
Feeling a bit fragile what with a disappointing trip to Hull followed by an even more disappointing last day of the window yesterday 😁😁
 
STID2017 said:
Swanjaxs said:
Yes, I did realise it was a joke actually, you do realise my reply was also a joke right? :lol:

Seemed a bit personal .
Feeling a bit fragile what with a disappointing trip to Hull followed by an even more disappointing last day of the window yesterday 😁😁

Never mind mate, tonight will cheer you up. 2-0. Piroe and…oh…Piroe.
 
legoman said:
Glyn1 said:
But I don't know of any other job where your boss can extend your contract against your will and also refuse to give you a pay rise.

Ah, so what was included in Pato's contract then? Do you think he wasn't aware of its terms before he signed? Do you think the club have driven a coach and horses through the contract terms then? Genuine questions.

I know as little as everyone else here and am certainly not "in the know" about any of this. What we do know, is that the management decided to trigger the option to extend his contract. Nowhere have they stated that when they did that it was to be on improved terms, and there isn't any reason why they wouldn't have stated that; so I'm pretty comfortable with my assumption.

I'm definitely sure that Pato, his advisers, and the club have between them c*cked this up.
 
STID2017 said:
Swanjaxs said:
Yes, I did realise it was a joke actually, you do realise my reply was also a joke right? :lol:

Seemed a bit personal .
Feeling a bit fragile what with a disappointing trip to Hull followed by an even more disappointing last day of the window yesterday 😁😁

No worries mate, nothing personal at all, just my weird sense of humour 😀
 

Members online

Back
Top