• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

Paul Clement

  • Thread starter Thread starter Curtis
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 34
  • Views Views: Views 2,674
Not sure there would be a lot of point tbh. Fans forums allow for direct feedback from a larger group of supporters
 
That isn’t lost on me either. I think the word that best describes what the future Trust board was and still is, is turncoats.
I would go for either “collaborators”; “traitors”; or “shithouses”
 
I don't think Clement was anywhere near as bad as some of the coaches we had post-Laudrup. Bradley and Carvalhal were far worse. I think he was better than Monk and Guidolin as well.

When he first came he was astute enough to realise that our best two players were Siggy and Llorente, something that seemed to escape Bradley and Guidolin. He also reinstated Leon, who'd previously been axed. He built a very effective game plan around the two star men and in the end we stayed up with relative ease.

The problem he had is he came at a time where the new owners were bedding in and decided to experiment with the concept of flogging our best players and replacing them with crap. His game plan fell apart that summer. He didn't handle it very well, and in the end deserved the sack, but I still think he was shafted really. Felt a bit sorry for him.
He was shite. Cooperesque levels of shithousery.
 

Swansea City 🦢v Hull City 🐯

Back
Top