Rachel Reeves

[Pompeyjack]

Any thoughts on Rachel Reeves being caught breaking the law? And should she be prosecuted?

 

[Darran]

She should resign.

 

[Smurph]

From what I can gather the independent ethics adviser was contacted and advised there was no case to answer.

 

[Professor]

As she let through agents they are as culpable in poor advice. It's about the same level as speeding to be frank. Absolute stitch up by the greedy billionaires who may have to pay more tax.

 

[Darran]

From what I can gather the independent ethics adviser was contacted and advised there was no case to answer.

Aye the poor cunt should have taken advice off someone who knows about things like this,someone like the Chancellor of the Exchequer perhaps.

 

[3swan]

My trust in M.P's is at a low bar but.if as reported she went through an agency you would have thought they should have checked.
This stupidity within politics to jump on the slightest thing to play games with is pathetic.
Put more effort into getting this country back on its feet.
If there is true criminality call it but everyone can make a genuine mistake.

 

[Darran]

My trust in M.P's is at a low bar but.if as reported she went through an agency you would have thought they should have checked.
This stupidity within politics to jump on the slightest thing to play games with is pathetic.
Put more effort into getting this country back on its feet.
If there is true criminality call it but everyone can make a genuine mistake.

MP’s don’t make genuine mistakes.

 

[3swan]

MP’s don’t make genuine mistakes.

As I said putting aside my views on them the odd genuine mistake can happen
It's the false political games that I hate.

 

[monmouth]

As she let through agents they are as culpable in poor advice. It's about the same level as speeding to be frank. Absolute stitch up by the greedy billionaires who may have to pay more tax.

I agree with the muck raking intentions, they are shit scared of any powerful woman and it's amazing how some others of different political persuasion get off with being Russian assets and all sorts of corruption. It's not quite like speeding though, but the intention is aimed at slum landlords.

The Licence is only £945 so the Chancellor aint going to deliberately avoid that...but agents act for you and that means unless she has it in writing that it's their responsibility, she might be on a sticky wicket politically, and legally. The remedies are potentially eye watering (another reason she wouldn't be so stupid.).

Expect lots of holier than thou nonsense from Fashboys everywhere. Meanwhile, Fartage will continue his racist grift unhindered, even being outpaced by Tory scum....and, not a peep.

What are the consequences of not buying a licence?​

Southwark council’s website states that “you can be prosecuted or fined if you’re a landlord or managing agent for a property that needs a licence and do not get one”.

Failing to obtain a licence is a criminal offence punishable with an unlimited fine on prosecution, a fine of £30,000 as an alternative to prosecution, or an order to pay back up to 12 months in rent.

 

[Smurph]

Aye the poor cunt should have taken advice off someone who knows about things like this,someone like the Chancellor of the Exchequer perhaps.

It's the same one who investigated Rayner, unfortunately for some, on this occasion the crime doesn't warrant a public execution outside number 10.

 

[Niigata Jack]

It's the same one who investigated Rayner, unfortunately for some, on this occasion the crime doesn't warrant a public execution outside number 10.

I hate em all, especially Reeves and Starmer add Drakeford and his Cronies and we'll still have Labour under a different guise come next May in Plaid.

If we only had another viable option, but the isn't one

 

[Professor]

Aye the poor cunt should have taken advice off someone who knows about things like this,someone like the Chancellor of the Exchequer perhaps.

If she was Housing Minister then you would have a point.

 

[Professor]

Latest information suggest a royal mess up by the agency. If you pay professionals then you would expect they have some idea. If anyone who is not a landlord or agent in Southwark suggests they knew a licence was needed then they are almost certainly lying. Perhaps the more pertinent question is how much tax does Viscount Rothmere (the Mail's owner) pay in the UK? I pretty sure it's a lot less than I do.

 

[Darran]

Latest information suggest a royal mess up by the agency. If you pay professionals then you would expect they have some idea. If anyone who is not a landlord or agent in Southwark suggests they knew a licence was needed then they are almost certainly lying. Perhaps the more pertinent question is how much tax does Viscount Rothmere (the Mail's owner) pay in the UK? I pretty sure it's a lot less than I do.

If was only the Mail then you would have a point.

 

[exiledclaseboy]

The two most powerful women in a Labour government. One down. One to go.