• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Season 24/25 | The Official Match Thread | Burnley FC 1 Swansea City FC 0 | The EFL Championship

  • Thread starter Thread starter jackharris
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 311
  • Views Views: Views 46,611
Have watched the penalty incident multiple times on highlights now. Quite simply, there's no way that's a penalty. Grimes is sandwiched and pushed by two Burnley players, mostly I think by Bashir Humphries. His arms are slightly raised to defend himself against their aggression and there's no way he knew anything about where the ball was. That is a feckin disgraceful decision, the ref should be ashamed of himself. If anything, it was a foul the other way for pushing.
 
It was a harsh decision but who defends themselves with arms in that position. Looking at the replay again Grimes needed to jump and compete not get bullied. He was left quite static. Not a pen but don't have crap positioning to allow a crap ref to give a crap penalty. If any player is around the 6 yard box defending a cross we need to stand up to it.
 
Here it is ...
That picture is hard to argue with. Why the hell has he got his arm there. The law is still shite. It’s not stopping/giving any advantage or affecting the game at all. To decide games on that is not sport or what was intended when laws were invented. Would never have been given at the other end although ‘hands up 😆’ we’d have all been claiming it.
 
If that had happened at the other end and the ref hadn't given a penalty, the same people would have been saying it was a disgrace, ref was a cheat etc.

Law 12:
It is an offence if a player:
  • touches the ball with their hand/arm when it has made their body unnaturally bigger. A player is considered to have made their body unnaturally bigger when the position of their hand/arm is not a consequence of, or justifiable by, the player’s body movement for that specific situation. By having their hand/arm in such a position, the player takes a risk of their hand/arm being hit by the ball and being penalised
It may have seemed harsh but Grimes had his hand above his head (no idea why as he didn't even jump), making his body unnaturally bigger, and the ball hit it so, by the letter of the law, it was a penalty.

A very harsh way to lose the game, as I felt we'd done enough to draw but we're always living on a knife edge because we just don't offer anything in attack
 
If that had happened at the other end and the ref hadn't given a penalty, the same people would have been saying it was a disgrace, ref was a cheat etc.

Law 12:
It is an offence if a player:
  • touches the ball with their hand/arm when it has made their body unnaturally bigger. A player is considered to have made their body unnaturally bigger when the position of their hand/arm is not a consequence of, or justifiable by, the player’s body movement for that specific situation. By having their hand/arm in such a position, the player takes a risk of their hand/arm being hit by the ball and being penalised
It may have seemed harsh but Grimes had his hand above his head (no idea why as he didn't even jump), making his body unnaturally bigger, and the ball hit it so, by the letter of the law, it was a penalty.

A very harsh way to lose the game, as I felt we'd done enough to draw but we're always living on a knife edge because we just don't offer anything in attack
Grimes couldn't jump, he was being squashed and pushed by two Burnley players. Watch it in real time, not still photos.
 
That picture is hard to argue with. Why the hell has he got his arm there. The law is still shite. It’s not stopping/giving any advantage or affecting the game at all. To decide games on that is not sport or what was intended when laws were invented. Would never have been given at the other end although ‘hands up 😆’ we’d have all been claiming it.
To be honest I thought it was a penalty when it happened, i think there was a high degree of panic on Grimes behalf...
 
Grimes couldn't jump, he was being squashed and pushed by two Burnley players. Watch it in real time, not still photos.
I've watched it several times now, he doesn't actually do anything apart from a weird recoiling action as if he was scared to get hurt. It just makes no sense why he had his hand up above his head
 
If that had happened at the other end and the ref hadn't given a penalty, the same people would have been saying it was a disgrace, ref was a cheat etc.

Law 12:
It is an offence if a player:
  • touches the ball with their hand/arm when it has made their body unnaturally bigger. A player is considered to have made their body unnaturally bigger when the position of their hand/arm is not a consequence of, or justifiable by, the player’s body movement for that specific situation. By having their hand/arm in such a position, the player takes a risk of their hand/arm being hit by the ball and being penalised
It may have seemed harsh but Grimes had his hand above his head (no idea why as he didn't even jump), making his body unnaturally bigger, and the ball hit it so, by the letter of the law, it was a penalty.

A very harsh way to lose the game, as I felt we'd done enough to draw but we're always living on a knife edge because we just don't offer anything in attack
Not making the body unnaturally bigger though is it ? In blocking a shot or cross with arm out etc then yes. His arm is just in the air. It hasn't blocked and he hasn't sought to seek any advantage by it being in that position. He actually accidentally helped Burnley by deflecting a ball that was dropping towards his feet go to one of their attackers
 
Not making the body unnaturally bigger though is it ? In blocking a shot or cross with arm out etc then yes. His arm is just in the air. It hasn't blocked and he hasn't sought to seek any advantage by it being in that position. He actually accidentally helped Burnley by deflecting a ball that was dropping towards his feet go to one of their attackers
Of course it made him bigger, his hand was about 6 inches above his head and the ball hit it.
As the wording of the law states:

"A player is considered to have made their body unnaturally bigger when the position of their hand/arm is not a consequence of, or justifiable by, the player’s body movement for that specific situation"
His body didn't move off the ground so there was no reason for his arm to be up in the air. Therefore, the position of his hand/arm was not a consequence of his body movement.

I'm sure if that had been a Burnley player at the other end you would be saying the exact opposite
 

Members online

Back
Top