Vetchonian said:
I do but can you honestly say what we are curretntly witnessing is better? Or indicates we will be better? Better than what?
You are very loose with true facts like you have posted elsewhere baout Potter not playing Dan James until January yet Dan James was playing from September..
It is the perpetual myths that get me going...I wouldnt settle for dreadful mediocrity, we all ahve our opinions mine is Cooper did what he did to get the best out of the squad of players to get results to achieve the goal he had been given by his employers ie get us back to the PL. HE produced a game which won quite a lot of many games it also lost some it should never have. I post highlights which demonstrate the team passing the ball around the back line then passing it forwards on the floor and some good attacking moves yet you still persisit that the football was dull......again we are all entitiled to our opinions....Cooper has gone now but will this new manager receive the same critiscim for being arrogant and not switching plan /tactics despite them not working?
For what ever reason maybe due to his roots Cooper was not favoured by many on here....for me I felt he did a good jpb with the resources at his disposal...many said Cooper could not play the football some craved and look forward to Martin playing due to the quality in our squad but this was rubbished yet our new manager is already saying the squad needs an overhaul as we have "square pegs in round holes" to quote him before we can play that way.......you know what they say about bad workmen and tools! But for me the jury is still out but like all managers before him despite my opinions on their capabilities etc he will get my support and criticism too
Of course what we are witnessing isn't any better but why would you expect it to be? He's been here 18 days in which time we've played 4 games. How much time has he had working with them?
It doesn't need to come down to Cooper v Martin because you would assume that Cooper was charged with getting us back up, by hook or by crook, whilst we still had the parachute money/Ayew, etc. Cooper did what he had to do and finished about where he should have done, given the squad he had. He didn't fail but he didn't perform miracles, either.
However, we are now at a stage where the money has gone down again, we have lost one of the most influential players in the division in Ayew and we need to think about where we go from here. Clearly they have decided that they want to go back to what made us successful which is to play nice, attractive, attacking football and create a bit of a niche for ourselves. Unfortunately, due to years of constantly trying to stay up/get back up by any means necessary, we don't have the players who can fit into that style.
I think it's unfair to say that he is a bad workman blaming his tools because if, for instance, you want to play with high wing backs, essentially playing as wingers, there isn't one sensible Swans fan who would say that Bidwell/Lati could ever fulfil that role adequately, no matter what how much they were conditioned or coached. Not one of the current squad would get close to the side that came up under Martinez or got promoted under Brendan.
Playing attractive football isn't just about entertaining the fans, it's about us having an identity and a uniform way of playing so we can be successful. The alternative is just being a run of the mill team/club, chasing after the same players as everyone else but being unable to compete financially.
I think you probably need to get over your obsession with Cooper. Showing a few videos where we played some forward passes isn't proof that the football under him was as dull as ditch water. However, discussing whether he was simply doing the best he could with limited players/resources under a mandate to just get promoted may be a point worth discussing. Pretending his football was entertaining/exciting/different is laughable