DJack
Lee Trundle
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2020
- Messages
- 1,766
- Reaction score
- 34
Arthur_From_OTB said:DJack said:I'm not shouting... it's called emphasis Anyway back on track...
The sophistry in both yours and Lavrovs post is obvious. At one time I thought you were just a "useful idiot" but it is apparent that you are either an apologist or a shill. The apologists and shills use FUD, sophistry, outright lies, misdirection, half truths, tautologies, "just asking questions", " "listen to this and research for yourself" as a basic function. This is then amplified by poisoned sources of information and paid for articles backing their points up.
Fact - the sample did not contain BZ, the separate control sample may have.
Fact - As a "reminder" to youThe OPCW stated that "11.The TAV team notes that the toxic chemical was of high purity. The latter is concluded from the almost complete absence of impurities."
Then you blather about whistleblowers, OPCW and Syria (more FUD for the gullible). The OPCW is an arm of the United Nations. It can only publicise reports that are approved by ALL of the the 5 permanent members of the security council. Can you guess which member repeatedly forces relevent information to be cut from these reports and/or changes the wording so that the report is basically very watered down...yes, RUSSIA
Yes, you will fool a few on here but many can see through your agenda.
I am not a Sophist. I believe in truth and not in winning arguments. You are right that I have an agenda. My agenda is to tell the truth to those like you who have been brainwashed. I am not a supporter of any political group. I am just an old man who is weary and fed up with listening to liars and hypocrites all my life.
When I say you are brainwashed I mean that you have beliefs that contradict your common sense and your own experience. You have these beliefs because they have been planted in your brain by propaganda masquerading as news.
If you are free of the tricks of the Sophists that accuse me of using then you will be able to answer the following question honestly. In the video clip from 2:44 to 3:10 in Andy1300’s post above do you think these "victims of a chemical attack" are acting?
If your answer is yes then what does that tell you about the reliability of the BBC when it comes to telling the truth?
In the spirit of honesty, I also challenge you to read the list of inconsistencies in the following link about the Skripal story and then tell me that you believe we are being told the truth about what happened there. What is your rough percentage of belief in our Government’s story now compared to your percentage of belief after reading the article?
https://www.theblogmire.com/the-salisbu ... de-a-hoax/
...So you failed to address the sophistry of Lavrov's tweet, you failed to address the fact that BZ WAS a control sample and the fact that the Novichok was high purity and not a "strange" version... Therefore your spirit of honesty is anything but!
I've been around on this board for a few iterations. I was born and lived for many years in Swansea. At least one poster knows me (we were in comprehensive together). Another poster, I used to talk to in Tesco when they worked there...TBH they don't remember me. If I "outed" myself there will be many who know me (and call me horrible names as I was nasty to them online). I would also mention that I lived in sink estates with a socialist parent and both parents marched on CND protests... I'm the person most likely to be pulled/pushed to hate the state and fall for manipulation by vested interests (I'm not a fan particularly). I make up my own mind.
Let's see your balls. Who the fuck are you comrade?