The Liverpool incident.

[Darran]

“You struck people head on, knocked others on to the bonnet, crushed prams and forced others to scatter in terror. You ploughed on at speed, violently knocking people aside or running over them, person after person after person.”

Prosser eh.

Who’s disputing that then?
I think he should serve the full 21,6 years but if he’d killed someone around the corner whilst drink driving he’d probably have had less.
I’m not sure what’s difficult to understand there.

 

[Darran]

But surely if you get into a car and you are drunk, then you know before hand that there is a chance you may crash into someone and cause harm, then the intent is there. Although I'm sure the law would argue against that view. Clearly I'm not lawyer just saying.

Don’t bother A you know what these argumentative twats are like.

They’re like one of those awkward pricks who get done for speeding but won’t admit who was driving the car when there’s a couple of people insured to drive it,they’d rather waste police time than admit it.

No aimed at anyone in particular of course.

 

[exiledclaseboy]

Who’s disputing that then?
I think he should serve the full 21,6 years but if he’d killed someone around the corner whilst drink driving he’d probably have had less.
I’m not sure what’s difficult to understand there.

You’re a proper offensive fool at times. Take another break.

 

[Darran]

You’re a proper offensive fool at times. Take another break.

No and as I’ve said several times in the past the sentencing laws in this country right across the board are bizarre.

 

[Jack2jack]

Don’t bother A you know what these argumentative twats are like.

They’re like one of those awkward pricks who get done for speeding but won’t admit who was driving the car when there’s a couple of people insured to drive it,they’d rather waste police time than admit it.

No aimed at anyone in particular of course.

Aye maybe for the best, take it easy pal

 

[exiledclaseboy]

Don’t bother A you know what these argumentative twats are like.

They’re like one of those awkward pricks who get done for speeding but won’t admit who was driving the car when there’s a couple of people insured to drive it,they’d rather waste police time than admit it.

No aimed at anyone in particular of course.

You’re a cunt.

 

[jack123]

But surely if you get into a car and you are drunk, then you know before hand that there is a chance you may crash into someone and cause harm, then the intent is there. Although I'm sure the law would argue against that view. Clearly I'm not lawyer just saying.

And that’s one thing, I’ve never been able to really wrap my head around, if some idiot takes his car keys with them when out on the drink, they should face the full force of the law.

I understand the difference between intent though, at the time a would be drink driver left the house with their keys, did they really intend to potentially cause death or serious injury to somebody?

I must admit, this had me think, if I was doing over the speed limit in a 20mph area, and a young child run out, and because of my speed, I caused that child an injury, then I’d be exactly the same as Mr. peed up Joe Bloggs, although I didn’t intend to cause any injury to anyone, my selfish actions at the time would have caused that.

 

[Darran]

You’re a cunt.

Thanks.
Here’s another incident I remember,obviously not of the same magnitude but he’s out in a year,should have had at least 10 and banned for life.

Four injured after 128mph driver's BMW causes major crash

Liam Hiett, 25, caused serious injury to four people in a crash on the Central Link road in Cardiff. His front-seat passenger said she would 'never forgive him'

www.walesonline.co.uk

 

[Darran]

I’ve no idea why you can’t have a decent debate on here anymore.

 

[Jack2jack]

And that’s one thing, I’ve never been able to really wrap my head around, if some idiot takes his car keys with them when out on the drink, they should face the full force of the law.

I understand the difference between intent though, at the time a would be drink driver left the house with their keys, did they really intend to potentially cause death or serious injury to somebody?

I must admit, this had me think, if I was doing over the speed limit in a 20mph area, and a young child run out, and because of my speed, I caused that child an injury, then I’d be exactly the same as Mr. peed up Joe Bloggs, although I didn’t intend to cause any injury to anyone, my selfish actions at the time would have caused that.

The law is a funny animal 123. And for us mere mortals its unfathomable.

 

[exiledclaseboy]

I’ve no idea why you can’t have a decent debate on here anymore.

It’s mostly cos of you. You are everything you claim to hate next door.

 

[Jack2jack]

I’ve no idea why you can’t have a decent debate on here anymore.

I'm out.

 

[Darran]

It’s mostly cos of you. You are everything you claim to hate next door.

I’m only asking why sentences are so different from similar (ish) crimes.

Seriously it wouldn’t surprise me if something else happens before Christmas too.

 

[jack123]

The law is a funny animal 123. And for us mere mortals its unfathomable.

Yes. Hopefully sometime soon, the law will change that favours public opinion. There’s been so many wasted lives, be it drink drivers, young men having a race and crashing and killing a family, There was no intent to hurt anyone, but they were doing 80 plus on the wrong side of the road.

 

[Darran]

Yes. Hopefully sometime soon, the law will change that favours public opinion. There’s been so many wasted lives, be it drink drivers, young men having a race and crashing and killing a family, There was no intent to hurt anyone, but they were doing 80 plus on the wrong side of the road.

Yes like this you mean?
The prick in Liverpool had more than these two cunts put together and he didn’t kill anyone.

Racers jailed after high-speed Glais death crash

Kelly Kennedy was killed "instantaneously" in the crash as she travelled home from work.

www.bbc.com