• ***IMPORTANT*** SOME PASSWORDS NOT WORKING

    There has been some issues with user passwords. Some users may need to reset their passwords to login to the forum. Please use the password reset option when logging in. If you do experience issues and find our account is locked then please email admin@jackarmy.net Thanks

Wood off

I would be surprised if the sell on fee is as much as 40%
Then again I am also surprised that Southampton want him, let alone prepared to pay £7m+ quid for him if all the paper talk is anywhere near accurate.

Obviously this means our shopping list gets a bit better this summer as we need a new centre half to plug the gap in the squad. It should hopefully mean though that we can fend off any interest in Darling and would be in a stronger position to reject any other offers for players we do actually want to keep.
 
I would be surprised if the sell on fee is as much as 40%
Then again I am also surprised that Southampton want him, let alone prepared to pay £7m+ quid for him if all the paper talk is anywhere near accurate.

Obviously this means our shopping list gets a bit better this summer as we need a new centre half to plug the gap in the squad. It should hopefully mean though that we can fend off any interest in Darling and would be in a stronger position to reject any other offers for players we do actually want to keep.
We'll plug a gap in defense just by getting rid of Wood 😂
 
I would be surprised if the sell on fee is as much as 40%
Then again I am also surprised that Southampton want him, let alone prepared to pay £7m+ quid for him if all the paper talk is anywhere near accurate.

Obviously this means our shopping list gets a bit better this summer as we need a new centre half to plug the gap in the squad. It should hopefully mean though that we can fend off any interest in Darling and would be in a stronger position to reject any other offers for players we do actually want to keep.

The poster you’ve quoted has impeccable club sources mind. He’s not a heard it from the milkman type…
 
The poster you’ve quoted has impeccable club sources mind. He’s not a heard it from the milkman type…
He’s also wrong a lot, he told us Piroe had agreed a new contract and Langstaff deal had been agreed.
 
He’s also wrong a lot, he told us Piroe had agreed a new contract and Langstaff deal had been agreed.
I know you hate it when I praise him, it was half the reason I posted it to be honest. Didn’t think you’d be this quick mind 🤣🤣
 
I know you hate it when I praise him, it was half the reason I posted it to be honest. Didn’t think you’d be this quick mind 🤣🤣
When have I ever said anything wrong about him? I have 0 issue with anyone it’s a discussion and I’m saying he’s not always right as we all know people get things wrong.
 
When have I ever said anything wrong about him? I have 0 issue with anyone it’s a discussion and I’m saying he’s not always right as we all know people get things wrong.
Pretty much every time I post about his inside info being brilliant. I will repeat, other than Phil S, he is the best out there.
 

Swansea City v QPR

Online statistics

Members online
25
Guests online
419
Total visitors
444

Forum statistics

Threads
19,947
Messages
273,329
Members
4,707
Back
Top