Kukharevych

[cmajack]

He will be close to 29 by the time the transfer window gets into full flow. This will considerably shorten the list of potential buyers as he doesn’t fit the model of buy > develop > sell.

He's surely been worth 2 million to them with his goals keeping them in the division. Experienced players can be worth their weight in gold. Surely it doesn't have to be that every signing a club makes they have to potentially have a reasle value on them, otherwise clubs wouldn't sign anyone over the age of 24 .

 

[monmouth]

He's surely been worth 2 million to them with his goals keeping them in the division. Experienced players can be worth their weight in gold. Surely it doesn't have to be that every signing a club makes they have to potentially have a reasle value on them, otherwise clubs wouldn't sign anyone over the age of 24 .

Cardiff would. And pay them 50k a week. Sorry, repetitive, but makes me smile.

 

[Cooperman]

He's surely been worth 2 million to them with his goals keeping them in the division. Experienced players can be worth their weight in gold. Surely it doesn't have to be that every signing a club makes they have to potentially have a reasle value on them, otherwise clubs wouldn't sign anyone over the age of 24 .

Don’t get me wrong, I would just love it (in a Kevin Keegan voice) if they blew £2m on him.

On the flip side I would be disappointed if we did it.

 

[bakajack]

1-2 million for a striker who keeps you in the Championship one would argue would be money well spent. Our prize money alone for finishing 11th in the league was I think 1.5m

 

[Dewi1jack]

Will be interesting to see what the summer holds for Kuharevych

He never had an opportunity under Williams and not sure he will get one under Sheehan
I do think he would do a better job than Cullen as a lone striker option though

I think he'd be the better one to keep if we can only get rid of him or Yates.
Would think he would make a good sub to Culls and vice versa.

Bianchini is not a striker.

 

[bakajack]

I think he'd be the better one to keep if we can only get rid of him or Yates.
Would think he would make a good sub to Culls and vice versa.

Bianchini is not a striker.

I agree on that, just because Bianchini can play up top does not mean he is a striker, especially in a lone striker system like ours. He is a winger by trade and needs to be treated and trained like a winger

 

[cmajack]

I think he'd be the better one to keep if we can only get rid of him or Yates.
Would think he would make a good sub to Culls and vice versa.

Bianchini is not a striker.

Bianchini doesn't seem to be anything under Sheehan.