• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

VAR - Man City

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ringwood
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 42
  • Views Views: Views 2,767

Ringwood

Alan Curtis
Joined
Jan 17, 2024
Messages
3,704
Reaction score
1,576
New depths of how VAR is ruining the game.

Man City's third goal a joy to watch.
 
I don't understand the outrage over that. Szob clearly pulled back Haaland - a red card (correctly). Haaland then fouled Szob, who possibly could have stopped the ball crossing the line otherwise. You can play advantage after the first offence, but you can't just ignore the second offence. VAR perfectly correct in my book.
 
Wherever he is right now, Matt the Jack will be smugly telling people off 📖📘
 
“There is no football person who would disallow that goal”.

G.Neville, 08/02/26.
He’s worked you out, Daps 😂

Complete nonsense by VAR once again.
2 wrongs don't make a right unfortunately.
Szoboszlai fouls Haaland and then Haaland fouls Szoboszlai. Both fouls.

We all want to see goals but you can't be giving it and ignoring the rules.
I wouldn't lose any sleep with Gary Neville's comments given he said seconds after seeing the video from VAR that it won't stand after his original statement.

Imagine that goal going in against us in the 90th minute and it's 0-0!
 
Unless the ref blows for the initial grab of the shirt on Haaland by the Liverpool player that is a goal everyday of the week.
 
2 wrongs don't make a right unfortunately.
Szoboszlai fouls Haaland and then Haaland fouls Szoboszlai. Both fouls.

We all want to see goals but you can't be giving it and ignoring the rules.
I wouldn't lose any sleep with Gary Neville's comments given he said seconds after seeing the video from VAR that it won't stand after his original statement.

Imagine that goal going in against us in the 90th minute and it's 0-0!
Go and stand in the corner with Mr Ploppy.
 
Go and stand in the corner with Mr Ploppy.
What's your justification for ignoring the foul by Haaland on Szoboszlai? The fact that Szoboszlai fouled Haaland first, so they cancel out? Bizarre.
 
What's your justification for ignoring the foul by Haaland on Szoboszlai? The fact that Szoboszlai fouled Haaland first, so they cancel out? Bizarre.
Yeah yeah, we all know the rules now that we have seen it played back. Pawson didn’t blow up, and I don’t blame him. This has been brought on by the law makers who deny refs the ability to make common sense decisions.
 
Yeah yeah, we all know the rules now that we have seen it played back. Pawson didn’t blow up, and I don’t blame him. This has been brought on by the law makers who deny refs the ability to make common sense decisions.
Pawson didn't blow up because he's pants. And like most refs and linos now they let the play finish and hope VAR will sort it out retrospectively. Which it did correctly in this case. Honestly, I don't know what people (Gary Nev, looking at you) are watching these days. It was obvious to me in real time what the eventual outcome would be - and I was right.
 
Pawson didn't blow up because he's pants. And like most refs and linos now they let the play finish and hope VAR will sort it out retrospectively. Which it did correctly in this case. Honestly, I don't know what people (Gary Nev, looking at you) are watching these days. It was obvious to me in real time what the eventual outcome would be - and I was right.
If the referee didn't blow, then it should be a goal. Those sat in the VAR caravan are slowly killing the enjoyment of the game.
 

Members online

Back
Top