• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

Londonlisa2001's latest activity

  • L
    Londonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.
    I think some of them very much do give a f**k and some of them don’t. In all parties. Interestingly the person who most doesn’t give a...
  • L
    Londonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.
    I’m unsure whether he can turn it around. It depends who the successor would be. And I wouldn’t trust the Labour membership to chose the...
  • L
    Londonlisa2001 replied to the thread Kim Hellberg.
    I understand why people would think that but I wouldn’t have made the choice. Anyway, I very much hoped that he’d prove to be a...
  • L
    Londonlisa2001 replied to the thread Adam Worth.
    That’s not him
  • L
    Londonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.
    Oh, in which case you may be right. Although Reeves wont go soon. The market response would be hugely damaging.
  • L
    Londonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.
    Don’t think so. Can’t see him lasting past the May locals.
  • L
    Londonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.
    I took ‘they’ to mean the Labour Party in the post I was responding to. Starmer won’t last the year.
  • L
    Londonlisa2001 replied to the thread Adam Worth.
    I wouldn’t go that far… 😂
  • L
    Londonlisa2001 replied to the thread Kim Hellberg.
    I’ve said before that I understood the reasons for the appointment, although it wouldn’t have been my choice, but I have to say that...
  • L
    Londonlisa2001 replied to the thread Adam Worth.
    Not sure why you think he was a teenager. He’s not young. Anyway, isn’t this all a bit ridiculous? Whatever history any of us may...
  • L
    Londonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.
    For them to go, a large number of Labour MPs would need to vote for a general election in the full knowledge that they’ll lose their...
  • L
    Londonlisa2001 replied to the thread Adam Worth.
    lol. He’s posted on here in the last two weeks.
  • L
    Londonlisa2001 replied to the thread SHEEHAN SACKED.
    I wasn’t saying that at all. And I’ve already commented on the fact that no interim has been named. I’ve my own thoughts on what I...
  • L
    Londonlisa2001 replied to the thread SHEEHAN SACKED.
    Big business isn’t the same as football. Largely because you legally can’t leak in the way that a club leaks info because it’s market...
  • L
    Londonlisa2001 replied to the thread SHEEHAN SACKED.
    I didn’t say they were necessarily any good, just that they are getting info from the club. Having said that, Coleman’s piece in the...
Show older items

Members online

... and 8 more.
Total: 618 (members: 58, guests: 560)
Most visitors online was 16456 , on 19 Nov 25

Coventry City v Swansea City

Share this page

Back
Top