• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

From Beacon to Bystander: The Rise and Decline of the Swansea City Supporters’ Trust

  • Thread starter Thread starter JA News
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 14
  • Views Views: Views 1,633
Great article Phil and points out we had two.lots of sell outs.
YOU were there and know what happened and its a tragedy that the Trust has become what it now is
 
Spot on Phil, I resigned my membership when they reneged on the civil case. I haven't re-joined and don't ever see a time when I would.
Same here. When they reneged on legal action despite having a clear mandate from Trust members and a strong case I couldn’t believe it. I still don’t get it. Shame on them.
 
Same here. When they reneged on legal action despite having a clear mandate from Trust members and a strong case I couldn’t believe it. I still don’t get it. Shame on them.
Same for me. That ended my membership at a stroke.
They were elected to serve the membership and they did the opposite and ignored the members' mandate. A disgusting way to treat people.
 
Same for me. That ended my membership at a stroke.
They were elected to serve the membership and they did the opposite and ignored the members' mandate. A disgusting way to treat people.
Same here.
Good article Phil. Surprised you didn't mention that the Trust went against it's membership, as that was the death nail for the Trust for myself and many others.
Would be interesting to see the membership numbers now.
 
I truly believe some on the trust were told / asked to turn their heads away when Jenkins & co sold out.
 
A good article Phil and critique of the current Trust Board. The real big betrayal was the decision by the Trust Board to drop the legal action, without any reference back to the trust members who gave the Board the mandate to pursue legal action in the first place. We had a number of meetings attended by the legal representative from Goodmans solicitors and we were assured we had a strong case and even secured insurance cover in the event of our case failing in court. The decision by the Board to unilaterally withdraw the case, after large sums of our money had already been spent on legal fees preparing the case, without any reference to the members, was a complete betrayal and kick in the teeth for members. I resigned from the trust in disgust.
Time softens the blow and I have now rejoined the trust, despite it's failings. Unfortunately, the only conduit we have to the Board and the clubs owners, however inadequate at the moment is the supporters trust. We can protest outside the ground, we can complain amongst our friends and fellow fans but this will achieve nothing. If the Trust is to be changed. made more responsive, open and transparent, this can only be achieved by members from within. As the old saying goes, 'better to be pissing inside the tent. than missing outside of it'.
 
A good article Phil and critique of the current Trust Board. The real big betrayal was the decision by the Trust Board to drop the legal action, without any reference back to the trust members who gave the Board the mandate to pursue legal action in the first place. We had a number of meetings attended by the legal representative from Goodmans solicitors and we were assured we had a strong case and even secured insurance cover in the event of our case failing in court. The decision by the Board to unilaterally withdraw the case, after large sums of our money had already been spent on legal fees preparing the case, without any reference to the members, was a complete betrayal and kick in the teeth for members. I resigned from the trust in disgust.
Time softens the blow and I have now rejoined the trust, despite it's failings. Unfortunately, the only conduit we have to the Board and the clubs owners, however inadequate at the moment is the supporters trust. We can protest outside the ground, we can complain amongst our friends and fellow fans but this will achieve nothing. If the Trust is to be changed. made more responsive, open and transparent, this can only be achieved by members from within. As the old saying goes, 'better to be pissing inside the tent. than missing outside of it'.
Time doesn't soften the blow for me.
The Trust took my money, called a vote which was overwhelmingly for legal action and then, as a so-called democratic organisation, ignored the vote.
As far as I'm concerned they took my money fraudulently.
Never again.
 
'They didn’t settle because it was right. They settled because they were scared. Scared of losing boardroom privileges. Scared of standing up to the club. Scared of delivering on the legacies of those who had gone before them—those who fought, built, and believed in something far bigger than a seat at the table. The Trust was meant to challenge power, not cower before it."

Spot on, Phil.
 

Members online

Back
Top