• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

22/23 The Official Swansea v Sunderland Match Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter jackharris
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 128
  • Views Views: Views 20,495

What will the result be against Sunderland?

  • Swans win

    Votes: 17 73.9%
  • Draw

    Votes: 4 17.4%
  • Sunderland win

    Votes: 2 8.7%

  • Total voters
    23
  • Poll closed .
First half Swans were dominant Second half Sunderland totally on top.
Positives for me Naughton not playing, and Piroe needs a rest first touch worse than an elephant.
 
STID2017 said:
Nocountryforoldjack said:
Where the f**k did they get 6 minutes from, officials are bent,

In fairness, before the board went up, I called it at 6 minutes due to all the substitutions, injuries and time wasting ( plus time taken to sort out te fisticuffs ).
That was before Benda went down in the 90th minute, so I thought would go to 7 minutes.

You input 7 minutes into your phone :lol: :lol:
 
bakajack said:
15 out of 18 points. Mental that when you think about the 7 games before that we only got 6 points.

yes shame Martin hadnt realised Martinball wasnt working sooner.....that said look where we are now
 
PSumbler said:
STID2017 said:
In fairness, before the board went up, I called it at 6 minutes due to all the substitutions, injuries and time wasting ( plus time taken to sort out te fisticuffs ).
That was before Benda went down in the 90th minute, so I thought would go to 7 minutes.

You input 7 minutes into your phone :lol: :lol:

I did Phil - surprised he didn't add a minute on for Benda though :D
 
Piroes first bad performance in a Swans shirt, should've been hooked at HT
 
STID2017 said:
PSumbler said:
You input 7 minutes into your phone :lol: :lol:

I did Phil - surprised he didn't add a minute on for Benda though :D

There does seem a general trend with referees that they dont add on much for stoppages in stoppage time

Stillfeared he had given the penalty when Clarke went down mind!
 
PSumbler said:
STID2017 said:
I did Phil - surprised he didn't add a minute on for Benda though :D

There does seem a general trend with referees that they dont add on much for stoppages in stoppage time

Stillfeared he had given the penalty when Clarke went down mind!
Yes felt it could have gone either way,.
Thought the ref did okay - especially as we won !
 
Glyn1 said:
Nocountryforoldjack said:
Where the f**k did they get 6 minutes from, officials are bent,

According to the Sunderland forum it's because of our cynical time-wasting. They agree that the ref must be bent, and wonder how much we've paid him. And our 22 is a thug.

So nothing new there. They also can't stand Lee Trundle's voice. :D

One of them couldn’t understand why they weren’t giving foul throws against Latibeaudiere. It probably had something to do with them not being foul throws 🤣 just shows you’ll pick up on the smallest things when you lose.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top