• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Andrew Jones murder trial at Swansea Crown court

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raynor94
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 20
  • Views Views: Views 5,732

Raynor94

First Team Player
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Messages
246
Reaction score
49
Location
Mount Pleasant
The jury deliberated for 13 hours! I'm absolutely amazed that one person on that jury thought it was an accident.

After following the evidence for the last 2 weeks, it beggars belief anybody could come to that conclusion
 
There’s a difference between following the evidence in press reports of proceedings than actually being there, listening to every word and seeing every piece of evidence.
 
Bang on guilty AF, but let's not forget that perhaps if his "best friend" wasn't banging his wife (who should have kept her knickers on) this would never had happened 🤔
 
exiledclaseboy said:
Are we really suggesting the victim deserve to be murdered?

Absolutely not, but it's obvious the husband was driven to despaire by his cheating wife and someone he regarded as his best friend.

Absolutely no winners in this situation.
 
exiledclaseboy said:
There’s a difference between following the evidence in press reports of proceedings than actually being there, listening to every word and seeing every piece of evidence.

Exactly. Having done jury service two things spring to mind.

Following press and media reports of a trial will give you less than 5% of the evidence and rebuttal of that evidence and you only get the “sexy” bits. The devil is in the boring detail as always.

We had one juror who argued for hours that he couldn’t vote guilty in case there was a minute chance of not guilty due to his double having maybe committed the crime and he didn’t want to be responsible for sending someone to jail. This was in spite of the fact that the defendant was clearly as guilty as sin. We eventually talked him round and delivered a unanimous verdict but he was very hard work.
 
Andrew Jones "destroyed" the body. It's not entirely known if the whole truth will ever be known of how exactly he did it.
Rumours have been circulating for months on how he may have done it.

Depressing case.
2 families ,friends and a community ruined by an affair that got discovered.
 
I've sat on a jury, some of the thick cvnts couldn't string a sentence together. Let alone decide anyone's future.
 
Darran said:
exiledclaseboy said:
Are we really suggesting the victim deserve to be murdered?

Well there wasn’t going to be a happy ending when he was scuttling his mates wife mun.

Do you you think he deserved what happened to him?
 

Members online

Back
Top