• ***IMPORTANT*** SOME PASSWORDS NOT WORKING

    There has been some issues with user passwords. Some users may need to reset their passwords to login to the forum. Please use the password reset option when logging in. If you do experience issues and find our account is locked then please email admin@jackarmy.net Thanks

British Pomp

Gammons, snowflakes, Karens...
What the fuk is wrong with people nowadays, if your going for an insult just go old skool, call a twàt a twàt ffs 🙄
 
Neath_Jack said:
This whole thing is a great show, an extravagant show. And that's all it is.

My opinion is that there is no place for it in todays modern society, it belongs in the 1600's. And that's coming from someone who has been at more than a dozen Trooping of the Colours in my childhood. I have a photo of the queen on my mantlepiece, presenting a significant award to my grandfather. Next year would be a good time for a referendum on the abolishing of the Royal fam.

People being forced to pay their "respects" at events like football matches is not on. Or at least fair enough if clubs want to do it, but it should also be fair game for those that want to show their displeasure as well. I find all these "common decency & no respect" a bit sickening to be honest.

Will i watch the funeral? If I'm at home at the time it is on i will, but i won't be making plans to stay in to watch it though.

I've decided to half kill myself with a 10 mile and 1000 metre climb run up the Kymin rather than suffer any more of it on Monday. So I'll raise a protein shake to the old girl in the car park afterwards. Each to their own in terms of those that are glued to it (my missus for instance), but I'd had my fill a week ago. She should have been buried, done and dusted, last Monday.

In my view, there's a place for a ceremonial head of state for the tourists, and a proper parliamentary constition to stop the likes of President Johnno or Truss. What we've seen with Bozo is that the Royal power has simply passed to the prime minister anyway and there are zero checks and balances agains abuse of power. There is no reason to pour money and deference into a hereditary self obsessed 'firm' that is only concerned with its own sustenance.
 
Swanjaxs said:
Gammons, snowflakes, Karens...
What the fuk is wrong with people nowadays, if your going for an insult just go old skool, call a twàt a twàt ffs 🙄

What in the name of the SBJ is a Karen?
 
monmouth said:
Swanjaxs said:
Gammons, snowflakes, Karens...
What the fuk is wrong with people nowadays, if your going for an insult just go old skool, call a twàt a twàt ffs 🙄

What in the name of the SBJ is a Karen?

Fùcked if I know, there was a woman in the Co-op the other day complaining about something and someone in the queue shouted "stop being a Karen" everyone (except me) started laughing, she shouted back "fuck you, your all a bunch of Karen's) ...
I asked my missus when I got back in with the loaf, she just laughed and said it's a thing now 🤷‍♂️
 
JackSomething said:
Darran said:
I wasn’t forced to do anything I could have stayed on the concourse until it had passed if I’d wanted too but I didn’t want to and I had my grandson with me and he had a great history lesson from me.

It's a shame Cheap Trick are underrepresented on the curriculum...

The conversation ended with us talking about cremation after I told him Planet Rock had played The Flame last Friday for The Queen.
True story. :lol:
 
Darran said:
Epaul said:
ooo oooo please sir that nasty horrible man said something nasty about someone. Ya fecking gammon

Gammon? He’s the whole pig. :lol:

Before you insult people you need to make sure that you are a fine specimen yourself and with an head like yours, you got no chance a pig is rather charming and pretty to look at by comparison :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Darran said:
Niigata Jack said:
Yeah, that’ll be it, made his name taking the piss out of the disabled and vulnerable people, he’s a disgusting c**t. If program makers had any morals and principles they wouldn’t go anywhere near him.

Blimey. 👀



Me and you have had a conversation regarding that Bute from Scotland, so you know where I'm coming from, doubt he's ever contributed to any charity who help the people who he was delighted in taking the piss out of and made his money and his notoriety from, none of that matters though, it just shows his mindset to have made the comments he made and thought of in the first place, can't stand the sight of him and he's even got a page in some scum paper as well.
 
J_B said:
Words fail me.

https://twitter.com/Nigel_Farage/status/1569791902144417792?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1569791902144417792%7Ctwgr%5E8c972505a68456cf5b35b2efdc58b4163510fb66%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fukpollingreport2.proboards.com%2Fthread%2F50%2Fsep-2022-lab-con-ldem%3Fpage%3D65
Quite right (not Farage). Horrible durge of a song. Also, will take the average English person many years to successfully negotiate the two new words.
 
It’s not as if these ‘royals’ emerged from the soil and are continually shaped by the wind. The queen was a character and Elizabeth was the ageing actor who filled that role. There are no real princes/princesses, we have just created them all. It’s a grand civic performance, the Saxe-Coburg- Windsor Show, entertainment for the masses. We came up with the idea a very long time ago and decided that it would be permanent. It’s a combination of pantomime, power, propaganda and nostalgia for domestic and international consumption. And it works; the English have always been good at telling a story and they also crave entertainment. The queen character held it all together of course and was/is the most popular cast member. Now that era has passed, the rest will struggle to retain the audience. It’s on the decline and the script writers and PR gurus will be frantically attempting to conjure and curate. The cost of this production is eye watering: guardsmen, horses, valets, bands, footmen, (RSPB mentions an official Swan Keeper!) and on and on. And the variety of different costumes, insignia, badges, medals, braid, bonnets, bearskins, berets and other nonsensical paraphernalia and trimmings is stupefying. And then throw in the sets: palaces, castles, country estates, gardens e.t.c. Us subjects (the audience) all, in some way, play our part, no matter how small, it’s woven deep into our psyche. Took me years to see through it all. Millions of others think completely differently, are devotees of the show and would consider my views heretical, but that’s fine, imagination is a powerful thing. You can cite tradition, heraldry and history all you like, but it’s merely lavish adulation of quite unexceptional humans, based entirely on their titles, fabled lineage and connections. Not sure it should be abolished mind, many people would obviously be lost without it, but it should be disentangled from the politics and functions of an elected parliament. Perhaps just privatise the whole lot, hand it over to Mackintosh or Lloyd-Webber to run. If people need periods of choreographed mourning and unnecessary military pomp to fill their lives, then let them pay for it out of their own pockets. If they were looking for hosts of the Sycophancy Olympics, Pyongyang would be a joint favourite.
 
Westwiltsjack said:
It’s not as if these ‘royals’ emerged from the soil and are continually shaped by the wind. The queen was a character and Elizabeth was the ageing actor who filled that role. There are no real princes/princesses, we have just created them all. It’s a grand civic performance, the Saxe-Coburg- Windsor Show, entertainment for the masses. We came up with the idea a very long time ago and decided that it would be permanent. It’s a combination of pantomime, power, propaganda and nostalgia for domestic and international consumption. And it works; the English have always been good at telling a story and they also crave entertainment. The queen character held it all together of course and was/is the most popular cast member. Now that era has passed, the rest will struggle to retain the audience. It’s on the decline and the script writers and PR gurus will be frantically attempting to conjure and curate. The cost of this production is eye watering: guardsmen, horses, valets, bands, footmen, (RSPB mentions an official Swan Keeper!) and on and on. And the variety of different costumes, insignia, badges, medals, braid, bonnets, bearskins, berets and other nonsensical paraphernalia and trimmings is stupefying. And then throw in the sets: palaces, castles, country estates, gardens e.t.c. Us subjects (the audience) all, in some way, play our part, no matter how small, it’s woven deep into our psyche. Took me years to see through it all. Millions of others think completely differently, are devotees of the show and would consider my views heretical, but that’s fine, imagination is a powerful thing. You can cite tradition, heraldry and history all you like, but it’s merely lavish adulation of quite unexceptional humans, based entirely on their titles, fabled lineage and connections. Not sure it should be abolished mind, many people would obviously be lost without it, but it should be disentangled from the politics and functions of an elected parliament. Perhaps just privatise the whole lot, hand it over to Mackintosh or Lloyd-Webber to run. If people need periods of choreographed mourning and unnecessary military pomp to fill their lives, then let them pay for it out of their own pockets. If they were looking for hosts of the Sycophancy Olympics, Pyongyang would be a joint favourite.

Blimey. :lol:
 
Darran said:
Westwiltsjack said:
It’s not as if these ‘royals’ emerged from the soil and are continually shaped by the wind. The queen was a character and Elizabeth was the ageing actor who filled that role. There are no real princes/princesses, we have just created them all. It’s a grand civic performance, the Saxe-Coburg- Windsor Show, entertainment for the masses. We came up with the idea a very long time ago and decided that it would be permanent. It’s a combination of pantomime, power, propaganda and nostalgia for domestic and international consumption. And it works; the English have always been good at telling a story and they also crave entertainment. The queen character held it all together of course and was/is the most popular cast member. Now that era has passed, the rest will struggle to retain the audience. It’s on the decline and the script writers and PR gurus will be frantically attempting to conjure and curate. The cost of this production is eye watering: guardsmen, horses, valets, bands, footmen, (RSPB mentions an official Swan Keeper!) and on and on. And the variety of different costumes, insignia, badges, medals, braid, bonnets, bearskins, berets and other nonsensical paraphernalia and trimmings is stupefying. And then throw in the sets: palaces, castles, country estates, gardens e.t.c. Us subjects (the audience) all, in some way, play our part, no matter how small, it’s woven deep into our psyche. Took me years to see through it all. Millions of others think completely differently, are devotees of the show and would consider my views heretical, but that’s fine, imagination is a powerful thing. You can cite tradition, heraldry and history all you like, but it’s merely lavish adulation of quite unexceptional humans, based entirely on their titles, fabled lineage and connections. Not sure it should be abolished mind, many people would obviously be lost without it, but it should be disentangled from the politics and functions of an elected parliament. Perhaps just privatise the whole lot, hand it over to Mackintosh or Lloyd-Webber to run. If people need periods of choreographed mourning and unnecessary military pomp to fill their lives, then let them pay for it out of their own pockets. If they were looking for hosts of the Sycophancy Olympics, Pyongyang would be a joint favourite.

Blimey. :lol:

Let me know if it’s worth reading
 
Westwiltsjack said:
It’s not as if these ‘royals’ emerged from the soil and are continually shaped by the wind. The queen was a character and Elizabeth was the ageing actor who filled that role. There are no real princes/princesses, we have just created them all. It’s a grand civic performance, the Saxe-Coburg- Windsor Show, entertainment for the masses. We came up with the idea a very long time ago and decided that it would be permanent. It’s a combination of pantomime, power, propaganda and nostalgia for domestic and international consumption. And it works; the English have always been good at telling a story and they also crave entertainment. The queen character held it all together of course and was/is the most popular cast member. Now that era has passed, the rest will struggle to retain the audience. It’s on the decline and the script writers and PR gurus will be frantically attempting to conjure and curate. The cost of this production is eye watering: guardsmen, horses, valets, bands, footmen, (RSPB mentions an official Swan Keeper!) and on and on. And the variety of different costumes, insignia, badges, medals, braid, bonnets, bearskins, berets and other nonsensical paraphernalia and trimmings is stupefying. And then throw in the sets: palaces, castles, country estates, gardens e.t.c. Us subjects (the audience) all, in some way, play our part, no matter how small, it’s woven deep into our psyche. Took me years to see through it all. Millions of others think completely differently, are devotees of the show and would consider my views heretical, but that’s fine, imagination is a powerful thing. You can cite tradition, heraldry and history all you like, but it’s merely lavish adulation of quite unexceptional humans, based entirely on their titles, fabled lineage and connections. Not sure it should be abolished mind, many people would obviously be lost without it, but it should be disentangled from the politics and functions of an elected parliament. Perhaps just privatise the whole lot, hand it over to Mackintosh or Lloyd-Webber to run. If people need periods of choreographed mourning and unnecessary military pomp to fill their lives, then let them pay for it out of their own pockets. If they were looking for hosts of the Sycophancy Olympics, Pyongyang would be a joint favourite.

That was a difficult read, you could have put in a couple of paragraphs.
 
Westwiltsjack said:
It’s not as if these ‘royals’ emerged from the soil and are continually shaped by the wind. The queen was a character and Elizabeth was the ageing actor who filled that role. There are no real princes/princesses, we have just created them all. It’s a grand civic performance, the Saxe-Coburg- Windsor Show, entertainment for the masses. We came up with the idea a very long time ago and decided that it would be permanent. It’s a combination of pantomime, power, propaganda and nostalgia for domestic and international consumption. And it works; the English have always been good at telling a story and they also crave entertainment. The queen character held it all together of course and was/is the most popular cast member. Now that era has passed, the rest will struggle to retain the audience. It’s on the decline and the script writers and PR gurus will be frantically attempting to conjure and curate. The cost of this production is eye watering: guardsmen, horses, valets, bands, footmen, (RSPB mentions an official Swan Keeper!) and on and on. And the variety of different costumes, insignia, badges, medals, braid, bonnets, bearskins, berets and other nonsensical paraphernalia and trimmings is stupefying. And then throw in the sets: palaces, castles, country estates, gardens e.t.c. Us subjects (the audience) all, in some way, play our part, no matter how small, it’s woven deep into our psyche. Took me years to see through it all. Millions of others think completely differently, are devotees of the show and would consider my views heretical, but that’s fine, imagination is a powerful thing. You can cite tradition, heraldry and history all you like, but it’s merely lavish adulation of quite unexceptional humans, based entirely on their titles, fabled lineage and connections. Not sure it should be abolished mind, many people would obviously be lost without it, but it should be disentangled from the politics and functions of an elected parliament. Perhaps just privatise the whole lot, hand it over to Mackintosh or Lloyd-Webber to run. If people need periods of choreographed mourning and unnecessary military pomp to fill their lives, then let them pay for it out of their own pockets. If they were looking for hosts of the Sycophancy Olympics, Pyongyang would be a joint favourite.

Fair do's. You're new here aren't you?
 

Swansea City v Sheffield United

Online statistics

Members online
8
Guests online
231
Total visitors
239

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
20,684
Messages
282,128
Members
4,714
Back
Top