• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Burnley unwilling to match Swans current valuation

  • Thread starter Thread starter JA News
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 44
  • Views Views: Views 6,858
Swansea93 said:
https://mobile.twitter.com/Jayoconnor8/status/1565090018539888641

That looks a very reliable source.
 
Swansea93 said:
:o
Uxy said:
That looks a very reliable source.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Dinglejnr/status/1565091700485554176

Well, a rando quoting another rando definitely convinces me.

If Stu actually backs him up I'll buy it. It just looks like another ITK numpty hoping to get lucky with a guess.
 
Uxy said:
Swansea93 said:
:o

https://mobile.twitter.com/Dinglejnr/status/1565091700485554176

Well, a rando quoting another rando definitely convinces me.

If Stu actually backs him up I'll buy it. It just looks like another ITK numpty hoping to get lucky with a guess.

👍🏻
 
https://twitter.com/adjones_journo/status/1565379323296710657?s=21&t=GuaqZSgx2iBAsgDEllL39w
 
https://mobile.twitter.com/Jayoconnor8/status/1565385186950479874

We’ll see
 
The alarming thing about all this is even if we keep hold of Obafemi and Piroe we will still be threadbare squad wise.
 
Swanjaxs said:
The alarming thing about all this is even if we keep hold of Obafemi and Piroe we will still be threadbare squad wise.

At this stage I would rather Obafemi moved on so we could sign some vital positions we need filling, and having Piroe upfront is much better.
 
Swansea93 said:
Swanjaxs said:
The alarming thing about all this is even if we keep hold of Obafemi and Piroe we will still be threadbare squad wise.

At this stage I would rather Obafemi moved on so we could sign some vital positions we need filling, and having Piroe upfront is much better.

I agree but in that scenario if Piroe sustained a long term injury on Saturday we'd be screwed.
 
I can understand the club needing to sell, but Oba is the only player in the squad with significant pace. Baffling
 
Club has dodged a bullet here. Don't sell Obafemi, do nothing else, and argue that the window was alright really.
 
Uxy said:
Club has dodged a bullet here. Don't sell Obafemi, do nothing else, and argue that the window was alright really.

Absolutely, then continue to struggle on the way to the next window.
 

Members online

Back
Top